2014
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.86.1283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden symmetries of dynamics in classical and quantum physics

Abstract: This article reviews the role of hidden symmetries of dynamics in the study of physical systems, from the basic concepts of symmetries in phase space to the forefront of current research. Such symmetries emerge naturally in the description of physical systems as varied as non-relativistic, relativistic, with or without gravity, classical or quantum, and are related to the existence of conserved quantities of the dynamics and integrability. In recent years their study has grown intensively, due to the discovery… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
164
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 298 publications
(281 reference statements)
1
164
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, I 1 and I 2 are orthogonal to each other at t = 0, but in general case of α = ν 2 their scalar product is not zero and changes periodically with period π/ω. For the particular choice α = ν 2 , the vectors I 1 and I 2 are orthogonal vector integrals of motion of order 2 in the kinetic momenta, and so, they correspond to the "hidden symmetries" [1] of the system. They are, however, dynamical, explicitly time-dependent integrals of motion (similarly to generators of the conformal Newton-Hook symmetry D and K), d dt I 1,2 = ∂I 1,2 ∂t + {I 1,2 , H} = 0.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, I 1 and I 2 are orthogonal to each other at t = 0, but in general case of α = ν 2 their scalar product is not zero and changes periodically with period π/ω. For the particular choice α = ν 2 , the vectors I 1 and I 2 are orthogonal vector integrals of motion of order 2 in the kinetic momenta, and so, they correspond to the "hidden symmetries" [1] of the system. They are, however, dynamical, explicitly time-dependent integrals of motion (similarly to generators of the conformal Newton-Hook symmetry D and K), d dt I 1,2 = ∂I 1,2 ∂t + {I 1,2 , H} = 0.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hidden symmetries are associated with peculiar classical and quantum properties of a system [1]. They are generated by higher order in canonical momenta integrals of motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If V does not have a global minimum then what follows will only apply in a region where V > 0. We can notice that g n+1,n+1 > 0 implies that we can write 9) or in other words the left hand side defines a positive quantity that we can think of as the square of the length of an infinitesimal piece of trajectory in the space (q i , y). g AB then determines how the length is calculated starting from dq A .…”
Section: From Hamiltonian Dynamics To the Geometrical Liftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was further applied to a variety of integrable systems with the aim to produce other examples of irreducible higher rank Killing tensors [7][8][9][10][11][12]. It is important to stress, however, that none of the Lorentzian spacetimes studied in [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] solves the vacuum Einstein equations. The conventional Eisenhart lift [6] is an embedding of a dynamical system with n degrees of freedom x 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…. , x n ) (for a recent review with numerous examples see [12]). The equations of motion of the original system are contained within the null geodesics associated with the metric…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%