2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.094108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hidden symmetry of flexoelectric coupling

Abstract: Considering the importance of the flexoelectric coupling for the physical understanding of the gradient-driven couplings in mesoscale and nanoscale solids, one has to determine its full symmetry and numerical values. The totality of available experimental and theoretical information about the flexocoupling tensor symmetry (specifically the amount of measurable independent components) and numerical values is contradictory. However, the discrepancy between the theory and experiment can be eliminated by considera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…corresponding to cubic m3m paraelectric (see, e.g., Table I for SrTiO 3 ) allowing for the hidden permutation symmetry of the static flexocoupling [37]. For the case the inverse static dielectric susceptibility (16) tends to zero at ( )…”
Section: F Size Effect Of the Spatially Modulated Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…corresponding to cubic m3m paraelectric (see, e.g., Table I for SrTiO 3 ) allowing for the hidden permutation symmetry of the static flexocoupling [37]. For the case the inverse static dielectric susceptibility (16) tends to zero at ( )…”
Section: F Size Effect Of the Spatially Modulated Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static flexoelectric effect, firstly introduced by Mashkevich, Tolpygo [29], and Kogan [30], manifesting itself in the appearance of electric polarization variation linearly proportional to the strain gradient Considering the importance of the flexoelectric coupling (shortly "flexocoupling") for the physical understanding of the gradient-driven couplings in mesoscale and nanoscale solids, one has to determine its symmetry and numerical values. Unfortunately, the available experimental and theoretical data about the flexocoupling tensor symmetry, specifically the amount of independent components allowing for the point group symmetry [35,36] and "hidden" permutation symmetry [37], and numerical values are contradictory [38]. Namely, the upper limits for the values ijkl f established by Yudin et al [39], as well as the values calculated from the first principles for bulk ferroics [40,41,42,43,44], the can be several orders of magnitude smaller than those measured experimentally in ferroelectric ceramics [45,46,47] and thin films [48], ferroelectric relaxor polymers [49] and electrets [50], incipient ferroelectrics [51,52] and biological membranes [53,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%