“…The static flexoelectric effect, firstly introduced by Mashkevich, Tolpygo [29], and Kogan [30], manifesting itself in the appearance of electric polarization variation linearly proportional to the strain gradient Considering the importance of the flexoelectric coupling (shortly "flexocoupling") for the physical understanding of the gradient-driven couplings in mesoscale and nanoscale solids, one has to determine its symmetry and numerical values. Unfortunately, the available experimental and theoretical data about the flexocoupling tensor symmetry, specifically the amount of independent components allowing for the point group symmetry [35,36] and "hidden" permutation symmetry [37], and numerical values are contradictory [38]. Namely, the upper limits for the values ijkl f established by Yudin et al [39], as well as the values calculated from the first principles for bulk ferroics [40,41,42,43,44], the can be several orders of magnitude smaller than those measured experimentally in ferroelectric ceramics [45,46,47] and thin films [48], ferroelectric relaxor polymers [49] and electrets [50], incipient ferroelectrics [51,52] and biological membranes [53,54].…”