Hiding practices in employee-user innovation

Hartmann, Mia Rosa Koss; Hartmann, Rasmus Koss

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104728

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research has differentiated user types based on the paid producer innovation paradigm (e.g. Hartmann and Hartmann, 2023; Yu, 2021; Giusti et al. , 2020; Hamdi-Kidar et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recent research indicates that individual democratizing innovation involves two innovation paradigms: paid producer innovation paradigm and free innovation paradigm (von Hippel, 2017) [1]. Research has built on the producer innovation paradigm to distinguish different user roles, such as professionals and users (Poetz and Schreier, 2012); lead users, emergentnature consumers (Hamdi-Kidar et al, 2019) and internal employees (Hartmann and Hartmann, 2023); and embedded and end-user innovators (Yu, 2021;Giusti et al, 2020). However, we know little about free innovation paradigm, in which makers are involved.…”

Section: Innovation Tournaments and Maker Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research has differentiated user types based on the paid producer innovation paradigm (e.g. Hartmann and Hartmann, 2023;Yu, 2021;Giusti et al, 2020;Hamdi-Kidar et al, 2019). Unlike this traditional democratizing innovation paradigm, our study considers a new democratizing innovation paradigm-free innovation-to distinguish between creative and entrepreneurial makers.…”

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research has built on the producer innovation paradigm to distinguish different user roles, such as professionals and users (Poetz and Schreier, 2012); lead users, emergent-nature consumers (Hamdi-Kidar et al. , 2019) and internal employees (Hartmann and Hartmann, 2023); and embedded and end-user innovators (Yu, 2021; Giusti et al. , 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

How innovation tournaments promote makers' product innovation: economic or social incentives?

Xiao

Yang

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeResearch on makers and innovation has been equivocal regarding whether maker innovation is driven by internal motivation or external incentives. The motivation view favors the intrinsic motives of makers, whereas the incentive view supports external economic incentives. The authors combine both views to explore how innovation tournaments promote the product innovation outcomes of different creative and entrepreneurial makers, using economic incentives (money) or social incentives (love).Design/methodology/approachThe authors interviewed 42 makers and collected a panel dataset of 29,823 makers from the largest digital maker community in China using a Python crawling program. The authors analyzed the data using multiple methods, including cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, factor analysis and negative binomial regression.FindingsCompared with entrepreneurial makers, the product productivity of creative makers is inferior, but their product popularity is greater. The social incentive of innovation tournaments promotes the product productivity and popularity of creative makers compared with that of entrepreneurial makers, but the economic incentive is contradictory. In addition, social and economic incentives interact to generate inconsistent influences.Originality/valueThe study identifies creative and entrepreneurial makers and contributes to user innovation and innovation tournaments by integrating motivation and incentive views.

show abstract

“…Research has differentiated user types based on the paid producer innovation paradigm (e.g. Hartmann and Hartmann, 2023; Yu, 2021; Giusti et al. , 2020; Hamdi-Kidar et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Innovation Tournaments and Maker Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

How innovation tournaments promote makers' product innovation: economic or social incentives?

Xiao

Yang

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This research delves into the attributes of user ideas (quantity, popularity, length, and supporting evidence) [ 10 , 35 , 36 ], as well as the extent and variety of user interactions [ 8 , 34 , 37 ]. Through the lens of social networks, it examines the influence of network position and centrality on contributions [ 38 , 39 , 40 ], and the effects of collaborative innovation networks involving users, employees, businesses, and other stakeholders [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. It is indisputable that user contributions hold significant importance for enterprises.…”

Section: Theoretical Foundation and Research Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impacts of User Personality Traits on Their Contributions in Idea Implementation: A Moderated Mediation Model

Mi,

Zhang,

2024

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the realm of open innovation, users have emerged as a significant external source of innovation that enterprises cannot afford to overlook. Implemented ideas play a pivotal role in driving the iterative innovation of products within enterprises. However, the existing literature still lacks an exploration of specific impact mechanisms on contributions in idea implementation. This study presents a model that delineates the impact of user personality traits on idea implementation contributions, drawing upon theories such as personality trait theory, user engagement perspective, and trait activation theory. Empirical research was carried out by utilizing user data obtained from the Chinese high-tech company Xiaomi’s MIUI community. Personality trait indicators were developed through the application of text mining and machine learning techniques. To evaluate the models, a negative binomial regression model, which is well-suited for handling discrete data, was employed. The findings of this study indicate that user openness and conscientiousness positively influence their idea implementation contribution, whereas neuroticism has a negative impact on implementation contribution. Additionally, it is observed that user engagement plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between openness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and idea implementation contribution. Community incentives can positively moderate the impact of user engagement on the relationship between conscientious personality and idea implementation contribution. This study expands the analysis of the impact mechanism of user idea implementation contributions, which has important theoretical guidance and practical implications for accurately identifying leading users in open innovation communities and enhancing user innovation contributions.

show abstract

Why do user innovators want to pursue user entrepreneurship? On the influence of the communitarian identity

Yu¹,

Zhang²,

Bogers³

2023

Journal of Business Venturing Insights

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hiding practices in employee-user innovation

Cited by 11 publications

References 74 publications

How innovation tournaments promote makers' product innovation: economic or social incentives?

How innovation tournaments promote makers' product innovation: economic or social incentives?

Impacts of User Personality Traits on Their Contributions in Idea Implementation: A Moderated Mediation Model

Why do user innovators want to pursue user entrepreneurship? On the influence of the communitarian identity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About