2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051178
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchic Stochastic Modelling Applied to Intracellular Ca2+ Signals

Abstract: Important biological processes like cell signalling and gene expression have noisy components and are very complex at the same time. Mathematical analysis of such systems has often been limited to the study of isolated subsystems, or approximations are used that are difficult to justify. Here we extend a recently published method (Thurley and Falcke, PNAS 2011) which is formulated in observable system configurations instead of molecular transitions. This reduces the number of system states by several orders of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a general computational approach which accounts for the detailed structure of the RyR cluster, and which can be applied to more complex Markovian models, see Ref. [26]. To proceed, we follow Lindenberg et al [44] who show that in the high barrier regime, which corresponds to case I & II here, then the FPD can be well approximated by an exponential distribution.where is the inverse of the MFPT for the CRU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a general computational approach which accounts for the detailed structure of the RyR cluster, and which can be applied to more complex Markovian models, see Ref. [26]. To proceed, we follow Lindenberg et al [44] who show that in the high barrier regime, which corresponds to case I & II here, then the FPD can be well approximated by an exponential distribution.where is the inverse of the MFPT for the CRU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we will apply numerical and analytic approaches to address these questions. Our approach builds on the work of several authors, in particular Hinch [19] and Thul et al [20] (see also [17], [21][26] for similar approaches), who have applied the theory of stochastic processes to describe subcellular Ca signaling. As a starting point we will first determine the timing statistics of spontaneous Ca sparks within a single isolated CRU at a fixed SR Ca load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, running the model can be computationally demanding and in practice, the spatio-temporal dimensions of realistic models are limited. An alternative modeling strategy is represented by hybrid algorithms that treat nonlinear system components stochastically and bulk reactions deterministically (11,19,38,(53)(54)(55). In terms of Ca 2þ signaling, hybrid approaches explicitly ignore Ca 2þ noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, our approach can be seen as a generalized and applicable method to predict mesoscopic behavior from underlying complex microscopic dynamics, which was for instance explicitly approximated for clustered IP 3 receptors (Higgins et al, 2009). A slightly different approach for characterizing the dynamics of such a mesoscopic system was recently developed that is based on waiting time distributions of observable mesoscopic variables (Moenke et al, 2012). Due to the non-Markovian character of the mesoscopic dynamics, the considered waiting-time probabilities are non-exponential making calculations of the statistical moments of the dynamics based on Laplace transformation potentially problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time evolution of microstates is guided by the standard "master equation", that is in turn ruled by the elementary Markovian transition probabilities between pairs of microstates, while the time evolution of mesostates is driven by non-Markovian equations resulting from summing over the microstates defining each one of the mesostates. Applications and the further development of this approach have been reviewed in Ball et al (2000) and have been applied in a variant in Moenke et al (2012). A notable difference of our method, compared to other approaches, is that it provides an efficient way to compute the first statistical moments of the observable mesoscopic process for an underlying arbitrarily complex microscopic dynamics, as it avoids inversion of the often extremely large transition probability matrices encoding the elementary underlying Markov processes, by breaking them down into smaller sub-matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%