2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical anions at the electrode-electrolyte interface for synergized neutral water oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…247 In-situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy could be developed to detect the subtle EDL structure, specifically the details of ion distribution and reactant adsorption on the electrode interface. 248,249 Other inspiring techniques include electrochemical scanning probe microscopy, 250,251 enhanced spectroscopy, 252 and their combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…247 In-situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy could be developed to detect the subtle EDL structure, specifically the details of ion distribution and reactant adsorption on the electrode interface. 248,249 Other inspiring techniques include electrochemical scanning probe microscopy, 250,251 enhanced spectroscopy, 252 and their combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ liquid time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry can discriminate the ion–solvent interactions and properties in confined membrane pores, through which reactant structure and transformation inside EMs may be precisely acquired . In-situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy could be developed to detect the subtle EDL structure, specifically the details of ion distribution and reactant adsorption on the electrode interface. , Other inspiring techniques include electrochemical scanning probe microscopy, , enhanced spectroscopy, and their combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic environment at the electrode‐electrolyte interface is another critical factor that influences on the neutral water oxidation performance [7] . In our previous study, the identified hierarchical anion structure created a more compact double layer with enhanced electric field that expedited the water oxidation kinetics on a Co‐based electrocatalyst [8] . However, the interplay of the surface oxygen intermediates determined by the intrinsic catalyst structure and the local ionic environment determined by the electrolyte composition still remains elusive [9] .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the improved performance, the IrO x /Ni(OH) 2 still exhibited an overpotential of 421 mV at 20 mA cm −2 , with a much inferior activity to the acidic or alkaline media. We further adopted the ionic additives of borate, fluoride and their mixtures to tune the interfacial structures near the oxygen intermediates [8] . At 1.60 V vs. RHE, the IrO x /Ni(OH) 2 catalyst exhibited an outstanding current density of 96.8 mA cm −2 in the electrolyte with 1.5 M KF+0.4 M KB i , compared to 4.7 mA cm −2 in 0.5 M KHCO 3 , 19.3 mA cm −2 in 1.5 M KF and 23.9 mA cm −2 in 0.4 M KB i (Figure 1e and Figure S4).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Moreover, there is a strong pH effect on the OER reaction mechanism, which can be categorized into water oxidation under acidic or neutral conditions and hydroxide oxidation under highly alkaline conditions. 10,11 Therefore, it is important to customize the OER catalyst to response various application conditions. Specifically, RuO 2 and IrO 2 exhibit excellent OER activity in both acidic and alkaline electrolytes, but they are unstable at high overpotential and will be oxidized to form RuO 4 and IrO 3 and dissolved in electrolytes, especially in acidic electrolytes because the participation of lattice oxygen may lead to structural collapse to accelerate the dissolution of Ru/Ir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%