Hierarchical Bayesian model for predicting small-strain stiffness of sand

Abstract

This paper develops a hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM) that integrates the physical knowledge and the test data to predict the small-strain shear modulus Gmax for a target sand type. The limited target-specific data is combined with the abundant generic data through a hierarchical structure so that the variability of Gmax within one sand type and across different sand types can be captured. The hyperparameters that characterize the same underlying distribution of physical model parameters across all the sand types are first estimated from the abundant generic data. The model parameters for the new sand type are then updated as the limited site-specific data become available. The approach is illustrated using a generic database and two real examples not covered by the generic database. Multiple possible hierarchical models are compared in terms of model complexity and goodness-of-fit. The results show that the hierarchical modeling of small-strain shear modulus data is reasonable and necessary. The hierarchical model can provide less biased and more accurate predictions of Gmax compared to the commonly used complete pooling model, especially for cases where the site-specific data is quite different from the overall average of the generic database.

An Intelligent Multi-Ring Shield Movement Performance Prediction and Control Method

“…The stratum parameters reflect the physical and mechanical properties of soil or rock. Therefore, these parameters must be considered [50,51]. As shown in Figure 6, the shield machine traversed various strata.…”

Bayesian updating for ground surface settlements of shield tunneling

“…The results of numerical simulations are mainly dependent on the setting of geomechanical parameters of the soil mass (Ou et al, 2013;Tao et al, 2024). Although some geotechnical parameters can be measured from in situ and laboratory tests, it is still challenging to determine the reasonable values of soil parameters (Doherty and Bransby, 2021;Tian et al, 2022;Tao et al, 2023;Huang et al, 2023), due to the limited number of tests, the dubious representativeness of sampling points, and the inevitable disturbance of test samples. Inappropriate soil parameters have a directly adverse impact on numerical simulation outcomes and provide improper construction guidance.…”