2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-010-0152-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of early detection surveillance for plant pest invasions

Abstract: Early detection surveillance programs aim to find invasions of exotic plant pests and diseases before they are too widespread to eradicate. However, the value of these programs can be difficult to justify when no positive detections are made. To demonstrate the value of pest absence information provided by these programs, we use a hierarchical Bayesian framework to model estimates of incursion extent with and without surveillance. A model for the latent invasion process provides the baseline against which surv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem has also been noted in studies dealing with biological invasions (Abad-Franch et al 2010;Regan et al 2010;Stanaway et al 2011). Given that amphibian detection often varies over space and time (Mazerolle et al 2007;Curtis and Paton 2010;Gómez-Rodríguez et al 2010), our ability to produce correct inferences from co-occurrence patterns was heavily compromised by hypothetic false-null values.…”
Section: Study Area and Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This problem has also been noted in studies dealing with biological invasions (Abad-Franch et al 2010;Regan et al 2010;Stanaway et al 2011). Given that amphibian detection often varies over space and time (Mazerolle et al 2007;Curtis and Paton 2010;Gómez-Rodríguez et al 2010), our ability to produce correct inferences from co-occurrence patterns was heavily compromised by hypothetic false-null values.…”
Section: Study Area and Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Inferences can be used to disentangle aspects of the invasion dynamics itself from patterns of data collection, develop improved future surveying schemes, and design more efficient invasion management strategies. the invasion, misguiding management efforts, and misjudging potential future impacts (Stanaway et al 2011).…”
Section: Accounting For Imperfect Observation and Estimating True Spementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imperfect detection introduces two sorts of errors into spatio‐temporal distribution data of range‐expanding species: firstly, sites may appear currently uninvaded although the species is already present, resulting in false absences; and secondly, the documented time of first colonisation of a site may lag considerably behind the actual invasion of the species. Besides potentially biasing parameter estimates of invasive spread models, these errors bear the risk of underestimating the current extent of the invasion, misguiding management efforts, and misjudging potential future impacts (Stanaway et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because long-distance dispersal events have a greater impact on rates of spread than short-distance dispersal events, monitoring outlying populations remains critically important (Liebhold and Tobin 2008). In addition, because species' range expansion is the result of combined local population growth and dispersal (Liebhold and Tobin 2008), the development of tools to predict within-site population growth would provide valuable insights into why and when a newly invaded site becomes a source of emigrants (Stanaway et al 2011), Current work modeling M. schimitscheki population dynamics in relation to within-site biotic factors, such as host plant seed masting cycles and interspecific competition with the conspecific M. pinsapinis, will help refine our ability to focus monitoring and control efforts for this invasive wasp.…”
Section: Implications For Invasion Monitoring and Landscape Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%