2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-017-1062-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Cellular Automata for Visual Saliency

Abstract: Saliency detection, finding the most important parts of an image, has become increasingly popular in computer vision. In this paper, we introduce Hierarchical Cellular Automata (HCA) -a temporally evolving model to intelligently detect salient objects. HCA consists of two main components: Single-layer Cellular Automata (SCA) and Cuboid Cellular Automata (CCA). As an unsupervised propagation mechanism, Single-layer Cellular Automata can exploit the intrinsic relevance of similar regions through interactions wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13. We used six saliency map estimation methods including both hand-crafted ones (SR [67], VSF [66], and PCA [68]) and deep learningbased ones (NLDF [69]), HCA [70], and PiCANet [71]). The proposed method successfully learns how to enhance/diminish the target/non-target regions.…”
Section: ) Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13. We used six saliency map estimation methods including both hand-crafted ones (SR [67], VSF [66], and PCA [68]) and deep learningbased ones (NLDF [69]), HCA [70], and PiCANet [71]). The proposed method successfully learns how to enhance/diminish the target/non-target regions.…”
Section: ) Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the second row of Figure 12, the salient boat was well-separated from the non-salient regions by the SCA+SH+FDAG method, while the SCA+SLIC method also assigned significant saliency values to some non-salient pixels. Complementary to the visual comparison, we also quantitatively evaluated the saliency detection performance of the SCA+SLIC and SCA+SH+FDAG methods in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE) representing the difference between the obtained saliency map and the GT saliency map [2]:…”
Section: Application To Saliency Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More discussions about the values of M can be found in Section 3.1.3. To effectively integrate the results of the multiple scales M, the CCA method [46] was employed, whereby each cell corresponds to a pixel, and the saliency values of all pixels constitute the set of cells' states. For any cell in a saliency map, there should be 5M − 1 neighbors, including pixels with the same coordinates from different saliency maps, in addition to their 4 connected pixels [46].…”
Section: Multiscale Saliencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively integrate the results of the multiple scales M, the CCA method [46] was employed, whereby each cell corresponds to a pixel, and the saliency values of all pixels constitute the set of cells' states. For any cell in a saliency map, there should be 5M − 1 neighbors, including pixels with the same coordinates from different saliency maps, in addition to their 4 connected pixels [46]. The saliency value of pixel i in the m-th saliency map at time t stands for its probability to be the foreground F, represented as S (t) m,i , while its possibility to be the background B is denoted as 1 − S (t) m,i .…”
Section: Multiscale Saliencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation