Hierarchical clustering by patient-reported pain distribution alone identifies distinct chronic pain subgroups differing by pain intensity, quality, and clinical outcomes

Abstract

Background In clinical practice, the bodily distribution of chronic pain is often used in conjunction with other signs and symptoms to support a diagnosis or treatment plan. For example, the diagnosis of fibromyalgia involves tallying the areas of pain that a patient reports using a drawn body map. It remains unclear whether patterns of pain distribution independently inform aspects of the pain experience and influence patient outcomes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of patterns of pain distribution using an algorithmic approach agnostic to diagnosis or patient-reported facets of the pain experience. Methods and findings A large cohort of patients (N = 21,658) completed pain body maps and a multi-dimensional pain assessment. Using hierarchical clustering of patients by body map selection alone, nine distinct subgroups emerged with different patterns of body region selection. Clinician review of cluster body maps recapitulated some clinically-relevant patterns of pain distribution, such as low back pain with radiation below the knee and widespread pain, as well as some unique patterns. Demographic and medical characteristics, pain intensity, pain impact, and neuropathic pain quality all varied significantly across cluster subgroups. Multivariate modeling demonstrated that cluster membership independently predicted pain intensity and neuropathic pain quality. In a subset of patients who completed 3-month follow-up questionnaires (N = 7,138), cluster membership independently predicted the likelihood of improvement in pain, physical function, and a positive overall impression of change related to multidisciplinary pain care. Conclusions This study reports a novel method of grouping patients by pain distribution using an algorithmic approach. Pain distribution subgroup was significantly associated with differences in pain intensity, impact, and clinically relevant outcomes. In the future, algorithmic clustering by pain distribution may be an important facet in chronic pain biosignatures developed for the personalization of pain management.

Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice

“…The use of appropriate statistical methods for drawing valid causal inferences is a crucial element for the success of RWE studies, and the potential of emerging methods has been shown. 2 , 4 , 18 , 76 The fast-emerging field of causal inference develops methods designated to drawing high degrees of evidence from nonexperimental data 32 and can be especially used in RWE studies. 48 …”

Characterization of small fiber neuropathy in hypermobile Ehlers Danlos Syndrome

“…Patients’ paper body maps from the BPI were scanned; the numerical images were processed using a custom-made program coded in Python, inspired by prior work [29]. Each pain drawing was superimposed to a template divided into 56 body segments.…”

Enhanced Patient-Centricity: How the Biopharmaceutical Industry Is Optimizing Patient Care through AI/ML/DL

“…Characterization of individuals with fibromyalgia was based on brain futures. Hierarchical clustering was used in another study to evaluate chronic pain subgroups [ 80 ]. In addition, researchers found that ML could diagnose fibromyalgia with nearly 90% accuracy using a composition of the microbiome [ 81 ].…”