2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical comparative analysis of genetic and genitalic geographical structure: testing patterns of male and female genital evolution in the scarab beetle Phyllophaga hirticula (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

Abstract: It is generally accepted that genitalia are among the fastest evolving characters in insects and that selection on these structures may increase speciation rates in groups with polygamous mating systems. If selection is causing genitalic divergence between or among populations of a species, one prediction is that geographical structure of genitalic morphology would be in place before genetic structure of a rapidly evolving neutral marker. The current study tests this hypothesis in the geographically widespread… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(94 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The null hypothesis that the degree of exclusive ancestry is observed by chance alone (i.e., no divergence) was evaluated by estimating a P value using 10,000 permutations. Uneven sample sizes among groups can shift P values downward for smaller group sizes; therefore, significance was inferred at P < 0.01 (Polihronakis 2009; Gazis et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The null hypothesis that the degree of exclusive ancestry is observed by chance alone (i.e., no divergence) was evaluated by estimating a P value using 10,000 permutations. Uneven sample sizes among groups can shift P values downward for smaller group sizes; therefore, significance was inferred at P < 0.01 (Polihronakis 2009; Gazis et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A p-value was then computed as the probability of randomly obtaining gsi T values that are equal to or greater than the observed gsi T value [16]. As our dataset is unbalanced and it is known that uneven sample sizes can lead to an underestimation of the p-values for small group sizes, we assessed significance at 0.001 [12,16,45,46]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFA in combination with quantitative genetic analysis has also been shown to detect evidence of selection acting on biological shapes (e.g. Polihronakis 2008). Outline analyses are particularly useful in taxa where homology of landmarks is uncertain (Van Bocxlaer and Schultheiß 2010).…”
Section: Utility Of Efa For Distinguishing Cryptic Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%