2014
DOI: 10.3182/20140824-6-za-1003.00925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Decentralized Stabilization for Networked Dynamical Systems by LQR Selective Pole Shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and K is any stabilizing controller for Ḡ parameterized by Theorem 3.1. By (17), the problem ( 16) becomes an unconstrained H 2 design for Ḡ, which yields the optimal controller Kopt as in (13). The optimal hierarchical controller, therefore, follows as K opt = P T u Kopt P y .…”
Section: Convex Reformulation By Quadratic Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and K is any stabilizing controller for Ḡ parameterized by Theorem 3.1. By (17), the problem ( 16) becomes an unconstrained H 2 design for Ḡ, which yields the optimal controller Kopt as in (13). The optimal hierarchical controller, therefore, follows as K opt = P T u Kopt P y .…”
Section: Convex Reformulation By Quadratic Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent paper [12] also addresses similar goals as ours using receding-horizon control, but the scalability of their controller is subject to the sparsity structure of the open-loop network. Related hierarchical designs have been proposed in [13], [14], however, they do not exploit the convex reformulation provided by quadratic invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LQR-based consensus designs for leader-follower MASs was presented in [7] in which only local LQR problems were solved and no global LQR problem was considered. Next, in our previous research [8], we introduced an LQR-based method to design a distributed consensus controller for general linear MASs but the obtained controller is only sub-optimal. Recently, we have proposed an approach in [9] to achieve a consensus design with a non-conservative coupling strength where an alternative MAS model namely edge dynamics was presented that helps transforming the consensus design into an equivalent stability synthesis which can be derived by LQR method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), a classical control design method, has been proven to be an effective approach for developing consensus algorithms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], which usually results in solving structured Riccati equations. As previously shown, e.g., in [19,21] and references therein, low-rank consensus design can reduce the computational cost and possibly increases the consensus speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%