2001
DOI: 10.1080/136457001753192222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment

Abstract: Hierarchical decomposition of complex behaviour and systems is a valuable research methodology from human factors and information-processing psychology that can be applied to laparoscopic surgery. This article describes results of research on surgeons performing several different laparoscopic procedures, conducted in Vancouver, Canada 1995–98. Through top-down analyses of surgical procedures and bottom-up analyses of tool motions, results included detailed decomposition of the procedures through surgical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They employed a haptic interface to interact directly with the patient data, and robotically execute the planned trajectories, using a neurosurgical manipulator [9]. One of the main advantages to the top-down approach is that it is capable of identifying different granularity levels, and accurately describing the surgery with the required detail [10]. While this method is a natural way of representing general knowledge, and is easily understandable for human readers, as the procedure is usually captured by human observers, this representation rarely provide high-level detail about the individual surgeries.…”
Section: A Top-down Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employed a haptic interface to interact directly with the patient data, and robotically execute the planned trajectories, using a neurosurgical manipulator [9]. One of the main advantages to the top-down approach is that it is capable of identifying different granularity levels, and accurately describing the surgery with the required detail [10]. While this method is a natural way of representing general knowledge, and is easily understandable for human readers, as the procedure is usually captured by human observers, this representation rarely provide high-level detail about the individual surgeries.…”
Section: A Top-down Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously discussed with regard to surgical simulation [Satava 1996, Taylor 1999, robotics systems [Munchenberg 2000] and minimally invasive surgery [MacKenzie 2001]. Until very recently, there have been few concrete initiatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reporting-centered approaches have focused on nomenclature generation and translation [CEN 2001, Price 1998, Trombert-Paviot 2000. The operative approaches focused on optimizing human/device interfaces by modeling interactive aspects [Kragic 2003, Mansoux 2005, Trevisan 2003], on studying the surgical gesture to directly optimize surgical planning [MacKenzie 2001, Munchenberg 2000, or on studying surgeons' gestures for partial robotic assistance [Botturi 2005, Kragic 2003, Nageotte 2005. Finally, the need for perioperative surgical workflow optimization has recently emerged, especially regarding the specifications of the operating room of the future [Dickhaus 2004, Fischer 2005, Lemke 2004, Sandberg 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most natural approaches is to decompose a surgical task into a series of pre-defined 'atomic' gestures or surgemes [1][2][3], such as 'insert a needle', 'grab a needle', 'position a needle', etc. (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%