2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.27.221333
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical design of multi-scale protein complexes by combinatorial assembly of oligomeric helical bundle and repeat protein building blocks

Abstract: A goal of de novo protein design is to develop a systematic and robust approach to generating complex nanomaterials from stable building blocks. Due to their structural regularity and simplicity, a wide range of monomeric repeat proteins and oligomeric helical bundle structures have been designed and characterized. Here we describe a stepwise hierarchical approach to building up multi-component symmetric protein assemblies using these structures. We first connect designed helical repeat proteins (DHRs) to desi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designing de novo proteins using Rosetta has successfully provided many robust proteins with diverse topologies for various protein engineering purposes, including small molecule binding (Dou et al., 2018; Tinberg et al., 2013), therapeutic developments (Cao et al., 2020; Fleishman et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2019), orthogonal biological signaling system construction (Chen et al., 2019; Langan et al., 2019; Quijano‐Rubio et al., 2020), and material formation (Hsia et al., 2020; Pyles, Zhang, De Yoreo, & Baker, 2019; Ueda et al., 2020). A number of de novo proteins designed for the abovementioned applications have significantly different secondary structure features, and were generated using a similar pipeline, which all involved the key step of using the structure modifier in Rosetta, the blueprint builder (Huang et al., 2011; Marcos et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing de novo proteins using Rosetta has successfully provided many robust proteins with diverse topologies for various protein engineering purposes, including small molecule binding (Dou et al., 2018; Tinberg et al., 2013), therapeutic developments (Cao et al., 2020; Fleishman et al., 2011; Silva et al., 2019), orthogonal biological signaling system construction (Chen et al., 2019; Langan et al., 2019; Quijano‐Rubio et al., 2020), and material formation (Hsia et al., 2020; Pyles, Zhang, De Yoreo, & Baker, 2019; Ueda et al., 2020). A number of de novo proteins designed for the abovementioned applications have significantly different secondary structure features, and were generated using a similar pipeline, which all involved the key step of using the structure modifier in Rosetta, the blueprint builder (Huang et al., 2011; Marcos et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design proteins that assemble into nanocages, cyclically symmetric protein building blocks must be brought together to design larger nanocage architectures. Two common strategies for designing protein nanocages are computationally docking (17,18) or fusing (19)(20)(21) cyclically symmetric proteins (Fig. 1.…”
Section: Nanocage Design and Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After fusion, WORMS checks that the new orientation of the oligomeric interfaces matches the desired geometry. This approach was successfully used to design dihedral and icosahedral nanocages, with some designs incorporating functional ankyrin loop-containing domains (19,20). WORMS is an excellent method for designing antibody nanocages by fusing alpha helical domains of antibody-binding proteins to existing cyclic oligomers in the orientations required to form nanocages, as this approach wouldn't require designing (i.e., mutating) any part of the antibody.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WORMS [23], instead, is a general method to create helix fusions that has been embedded in a design pipeline for symmetric architectures. The desired symmetry is provided by the user and the protocol looks for compatible terminal helices available for fusion.…”
Section: Mixing Solenoid Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%