2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical formation of Westerlund 1: a collapsing cluster with no primordial mass segregation?

Abstract: We examine the level of substructure and mass segregation in the massive, young cluster Westerlund 1. We find that it is relatively smooth, with little or no mass segregation, but with the massive stars in regions of significantly higher than average surface density. While an expanding or bouncing-back scenario for the evolution of Westerlund 1 cannot be ruled out, we argue that the most natural model to explain these observations is one in which Westerlund 1 formed with no primordial mass segregation and at a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first few to 10s of Myrs of cluster evolution likely feature various complex processes such as hierarchical mergers and residual gas expulsion. Indeed, such processes are hinted at from observations of several young massive clusters (e.g., Kuhn et al 2014;Gennaro et al 2017). In particular, residual gas expulsion could lead to significant cluster expansion at early times, attenuating the long-term dynamical processing of BHs and thus altering the structural features of the clusters at late times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first few to 10s of Myrs of cluster evolution likely feature various complex processes such as hierarchical mergers and residual gas expulsion. Indeed, such processes are hinted at from observations of several young massive clusters (e.g., Kuhn et al 2014;Gennaro et al 2017). In particular, residual gas expulsion could lead to significant cluster expansion at early times, attenuating the long-term dynamical processing of BHs and thus altering the structural features of the clusters at late times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young star clusters show signs of mass segregation (Hillenbrand & Hartmann, 1998;de Grijs et al, 2002;Littlefair et al, 2003;Stolte et al, 2005Stolte et al, , 2006Kim et al, 2006;Harayama et al, 2008;Espinoza et al, 2009;Bontemps et al, 2010;Gennaro et al, 2011). However, observations of pre-main sequence stars in star-forming regions do not indicate mass segregation (Parker et al, 2011(Parker et al, , 2012Gennaro et al, 2017;Parker & Alves de Oliveira, 2017;Dib et al, 2018). Plunkett et al (2018) find the prestellar cores in Serpens South to be mass-segregated, whereas the pre-main sequence stars are not.…”
Section: Mass Segregation In Young Clustersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With ∼ 5 × 10 4 M (Gennaro et al 2017, and references therein), Westerlund 1 (Wd1) is the most massive YSC in the Milky Way. With an age of ∼ 5 Myr it has already undergone several supernova explosions and is dynamically more evolved than other, younger massive Milky Way star clusters (m > 10 4 M ), such as Westerlund 2 (Wd2, Westerlund 1961) or NGC 3603.…”
Section: Young Massive Star Clusters In the Milky Way And Magellanic Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%