Hierarchical Importance of Sport Talents Evaluated by Sport Talented

YoungKil, Yun; Youn, Jeon Jae

doi:10.14385/kssp.24.3.117

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…실제로 선수의 경기력평가에 경기력의 내적자원인 경기지능 (Roberts et al, 2019), 심리지능 (Durand-Bush et al, 2022), 신 체지능 (Yun, 2011)을 비롯해 외적환경인 지도자, 성장경험, 주요타 자 (Yun & Jeon, 2013), 가치와 평판 (Yun, 2015) 등이 맥락적으로 반영 (Yun et al, 2021) 13…”

unclassified

Performance Evaluation Factors Reflecting Player and Casting Judgments of Football Coaches

Kang,

Yun

2023

Korean J Sport Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE This study aimed to extract football coaches’ categories of performance evaluation factors (PEF) and examine the reflective characteristics of the football coaches’ player and casting judgments.METHODS PEF were extracted through an open-ended questionnaire and categorization from 80 AFC C or higher football coaches. Reflection was calculated in player and casting judgments through an analytic hierarchy process. The difference between the football coaches’ player and casting judgments was examined using SPSS 21.0.RESULTS First, the PEF of football coaches were categorized into four general categories: physical intelligence, psychological intelligence, growth potential, and competition intelligence. Second, the importance of football coaches’ player judgments were reflected by the PEF as football intelligence, situation judgment, football talent, tactical understanding, tactical operation, etc. The importance of the casting judgment were reflected by the PEF as tactical understanding, mediative skills, fitness, tactical operation, situation judgment, etc. Third, a statistically significant difference was noted between player and casting judgments. Football coaches tended to value growth potential and talent as sub-factors in the player evaluations. Football coaches’ PEF were aligned with the importance of player and casting judgments in psychological and competition intelligence as sub-factors such as skills, physical, attitude, passion, etc., but differed from physical intelligence and growth potential as sub-factors including mediative skills, physical, football talent, and tactical understanding.CONCLUSIONS In the football coaches’ player evaluations, the idealistic principle centered on growth potential. However, in the casting evaluation, the realistic principle centered on victory takes effect .

show abstract

unclassified

Performance Evaluation Factors Reflecting Player and Casting Judgments of Football Coaches

Kang,

Yun

2023

Korean J Sport Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…경기력은 선수의 스포츠영재성과 스포츠영재성 발화환경의 상호 작용 결과 (Yun & Jeon, 2013)로, 사회적 책임이나 도덕지능 (Yun, 2015)으로 확대 논의된다. 특히 스포츠영재성은 선수의 내적자원으 로 신체지능, 경기지능, 심리지능으로 구조화 (Yun, 2011)된다. 이러 한 스포츠영재성은 개인의 최고수행에 기여 (Kim et al, 2022)하는 데, 체력강화 (Song et al, 2012), 기술안정화 (Lee et al, 2004), 심 리적항상성 유지 (Jeon & Yun, 2014), 경기흐름 주도 (Kim & Jung, 2019), 종목지식 (Chung, 2004)이 중요하다.…”

unclassified

“…또한 운 동기능은 반사, 기초, 기본 움직임, 스포츠 기술, 성장과 세련, 최고 수행, 퇴보 (Clark & Metcalfe, 2002) (Yun & Jeon, 2015)은 물론 생애주기에 걸치는 영향력을 변화시킨다 (Kim & Yun, 2016). 또한 전성기 경험은 자원의 최적상태 이해를 제공 (Ashfield et al, 2012) 해 종목에 대한 태도를 변화 (Park, 2003)시키고, 이는 경기력 향상 (Yun & Jeon, 2010)은 물론 경기력발달에 중요하게 작용한다.…”

unclassified

Performance Development Span and Psychological Experience by Stages of Track and Field Athletes

Kim¹,

YoungKil²

2023

Korean J Sport Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to section the stages of performance development based on the track and field athletes' performance records, derive the performance development span, which was a continuum of the development stages, and extract the psychological experience of the performance development span.METHODS In this study, 56 retired track and field athletes were provided with competition records, and 10 athletes participated in in-depth interviews. With the stage of performance development partitioned using long and short-term moving averages and regression slope in PRR, a continuous of performance development span was derived. To extract psychological experiences in the performance development span, a subject analysis was conducted after an in-depth interview.RESULTS First, the track and field athletes' performance development stage calculated short and long-term moving averages in the PRR. Based on the average difference in the regression slope of the initial 20% CPR in which the long-term moving average was not calculated, it was divided into beginning, rising, peak, and decline periods. Second, the performance development span was a continuum of the stage was of performance development, and the beginning period was 0 < PRR ≤ 7, it was a time when the competition record rises sharply. The rising period was 7 < PRR ≤ 60, which was a virtuous cycle time of growth athlete. The peak period was 60 < PRR ≤ 74, which was a time when the peak record was maintained. The decline period was 74 < PRR ≤ 100, which was a time when the competition record was downward. Third, throughout the performance development span physical intelligence of track and field athletes was based on their natural physical superiority, the technical skills rises and remains at its peak and then enters a downward trend. Competitional Intelligence aims to become personalization as it matures gradually while its competition management capability and game knowledge are immature. Psychological intelligence overcomes the initial psychological atrophy to form confidence, and after experiencing psychological burden at the peak, confidence decreases. In the environmental context, the competition record rises in the early stages, continues to rise, peaks, and enters a downward trend.CONCLUSIONS Track and field athletes' performance development span was implemented as a continuum of beginning, rising, peak, and decline periods, and the psychological experience of the performance development span formed a span of physical intelligence, competitional intelligence, psychological intelligence, and environmental context.

show abstract

Perception of Psychological Factors Affecting Performance on the Youth Players

Kim¹,

Jeon²

2016

koreanjournalofsportscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hierarchical Importance of Sport Talents Evaluated by Sport Talented

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Performance Evaluation Factors Reflecting Player and Casting Judgments of Football Coaches

Performance Evaluation Factors Reflecting Player and Casting Judgments of Football Coaches

Performance Development Span and Psychological Experience by Stages of Track and Field Athletes

Perception of Psychological Factors Affecting Performance on the Youth Players

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About