2012 8th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iwcmc.2012.6314248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical learning for fine grained internet traffic classification

Abstract: Traffic classification is still today a challenging problem given the ever evolving nature of the Internet in which new protocols and applications arise at a constant pace. In the past, so called behavioral approaches have been successfully proposed as valid alternatives to traditional DPI based tools to properly classify traffic into few and coarse classes. In this paper we push forward the adoption of behavioral classifiers by engineering a Hierarchical classifier that allows proper classification of traffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset introduced in Section 2 was used for all the experiments presented in this section. We used WEKA (University of Waikato, n.d.) with ten-fold crossvalidation for reliability, as in previous studies (Grimaudo, Mellia, & Baralis, 2012;Hullár, Laki, & György, 2011). More in detail, in a ten-fold cross-validation, the data used for the experiment is partitioned to ten equal-sized pieces in a random fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset introduced in Section 2 was used for all the experiments presented in this section. We used WEKA (University of Waikato, n.d.) with ten-fold crossvalidation for reliability, as in previous studies (Grimaudo, Mellia, & Baralis, 2012;Hullár, Laki, & György, 2011). More in detail, in a ten-fold cross-validation, the data used for the experiment is partitioned to ten equal-sized pieces in a random fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results (pertaining to each single classifier in the hierarchy separately) show that the proposed approach achieves precision and recall ≥ 95% in P2P/non-P2P recognition and ≥ 93% in P2P-type classification, while a recall drop down to 71% is observed at last level. Similarly, Grimaudo et al [8] propose the adoption of a hierarchical classifier to allow Internet TC (into ≥ 20 fine-grained classes), showing a comparison with flat-learning results. The proposed tree-structured (three-level) taxonomy introduces also a first level which identifies known/unseen traffic.…”
Section: Hierarchical Traffic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we adopt the top-down choice (similarly to [8]). In this case, for each instance to be classified, the HC framework first predicts its first-level (most generic) class, then it uses that predicted class to narrow the choices of classes to be predicted at the second level (i.e.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Proposed Hc Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software is employed for a broader analysis of Internet traffic; therefore, as compared to other classifiers, it is expected to support fewer application protocols. In several studies recently, Tstat has turned out to emerge recreantly in literature as source of ground truth (Finamore et al, 2011;Adami et al, 2012;Grimaudo et al, 2012).…”
Section: Tstatmentioning
confidence: 99%