2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2012.00703.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Modelling of Disparities in Preferences for Redistribution*

Abstract: We evaluate the magnitude of the disparities in the demand for redistribution across European countries and American states during the 2000s. Modelling the demand for redistribution in a multilevel framework, we identify the determinants that contribute the most in predicting support for redistribution. We observe that individual characteristics and contextual variables are associated with demand for redistribution in the same way in Europe and in the US, whereas others exert different influences on the probab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(87 reference statements)
4
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have empirically assessed the determinants of preferences for redistribution relying mostly on surveys including questions about perceptions and values on redistribution and inequality. Some examples are Georgiadis and Manning (2012); Pittau et al (2013); Kerr (2014), Alesina and Giuliano (2011); Alesina and La Ferrara (2005); Luttmer and Singhal (2011);Guillaud (2013) and Corneo and Grüner (2002). Although all these works, and related ones, are important in the literature of preferences for redistribution, they do not address the effects of a major economic event, namely, the 2008/09 financial crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have empirically assessed the determinants of preferences for redistribution relying mostly on surveys including questions about perceptions and values on redistribution and inequality. Some examples are Georgiadis and Manning (2012); Pittau et al (2013); Kerr (2014), Alesina and Giuliano (2011); Alesina and La Ferrara (2005); Luttmer and Singhal (2011);Guillaud (2013) and Corneo and Grüner (2002). Although all these works, and related ones, are important in the literature of preferences for redistribution, they do not address the effects of a major economic event, namely, the 2008/09 financial crisis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survey-based studies find a positive association between low economic status and stated preferences for redistributive taxation and spending (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). However, although these surveybased results are consistent with our conjecture, they are also consistent with pure self-interest; purely self-interested individuals would state a preference for minimal or no redistribution when they are relatively well-off as this would minimize their tax burden, but would shift to favoring redistribution on becoming relatively poor owing to job loss (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ideología constituiría su factor descriptivo. De acuerdo con la evidencia empírica, los individuos de izquierdas favorecen en mayor medida la redistribución (Lane, 1959;Shaw y Shapiro, 2005;Singhal, 2013;Pittau et al, 2013).…”
Section: Marco Institucional: Percepciones Individuales Sobre El Funcunclassified
“…Ambas técnicas se alinean con los últimos desarrollos de la literatura comparada: valgan como ejemplo Pittau et al (2013), respecto del empleo de la metodología multinivel, y Tóth y Keller (2011), por lo que hace al empleo de un índice para aproximar la preferencia redistributiva de los ciudadanos. En la literatura española, en lo que conocemos, únicamente Jaime (2008) y Jaime y Sáez (2010) utilizan la metodología multinivel, en sendos estudios para los países europeos.…”
Section: Una Aproximación Empírica a Las Preferencias Redistribuunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation