2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.531218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Modelling of Haplotype Effects on a Phylogeny

Abstract: We introduce a hierarchical model to estimate haplotype effects based on phylogenetic relationships between haplotypes and their association with observed phenotypes. In a population there are many, but not all possible, distinct haplotypes and few observations per haplotype. Further, haplotype frequencies tend to vary substantially. Such data structure challenge estimation of haplotype effects. However, haplotypes often differ only due to few mutations, and leveraging similarities can improve the estimation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haplotype phylogeny may differ along the genome regions due to recombination and the process of swapping genome regions between haplotypes during the process of meiosis (Selle et al, 2021). Our aim was to find out haplotype effects by leveraging phylogenetic relationships between haplotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haplotype phylogeny may differ along the genome regions due to recombination and the process of swapping genome regions between haplotypes during the process of meiosis (Selle et al, 2021). Our aim was to find out haplotype effects by leveraging phylogenetic relationships between haplotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible direct mitogenome effects or interactions between the mitogenome and additive nuclear effects were therefore not considered but could influence the results. Possibly, more complex analyses targeting mitogenome effects [ 20 ] or SNP arrays targeting nuclear genes interacting with the mitogenome [ 21 ] would lead to more accurate conclusions. On the other hand, we accounted for possible confounding by age structure in our analysis because 44 “mutant” cows were born equally between 1997 and 2020, which adequately reflects the structure of the sample population (“normal” animals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, one must find representations of relationships between haplotypes. Several attempts have been made using similarities between haplotypes (Hickey et al, 2013), grouping consecutive markers based on linkage disequilibrium (Cuyabano et al, 2015(Cuyabano et al, , 2014, local convolutional neural networks that represent regions of the genome as part of neural network structure (Pook et al, 2020), and by phylogenetic analysis of haplotypes (Edriss et al, 2013;Selle et al, 2021). Selle et al (2021), who developed a model for prediction based on phylogenetic relationships between non-recombining haplotypes, propose that recently developed methods for inferring genealogy along the genome in the presence of recombination and representing it as so-called tree sequences (Kelleher et al, 2019) may be useful.…”
Section: Better Modelling Of Genomic Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%