2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4793782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical networks, power laws, and neuronal avalanches

Abstract: We show that in networks with a hierarchical architecture, critical dynamical behaviors can emerge even when the underlying dynamical processes are not critical. This finding provides explicit insight into current studies of the brain's neuronal network showing power-law avalanches in neural recordings, and provides a theoretical justification of recent numerical findings. Our analysis shows how the hierarchical organization of a network can itself lead to power-law distributions of avalanche sizes and duratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of HMNs, structural disorder arises from the stochastic nature of the processes by which modules at diverse scales are connected. The structural origin of critical-like behavior is in agreement with renormalization arguments, which show how in hierarchical networks even standard percolation produces generic power-law distributions of connected component sizes, a feature otherwise normally ascribed to the critical point (or percolation threshold) [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the case of HMNs, structural disorder arises from the stochastic nature of the processes by which modules at diverse scales are connected. The structural origin of critical-like behavior is in agreement with renormalization arguments, which show how in hierarchical networks even standard percolation produces generic power-law distributions of connected component sizes, a feature otherwise normally ascribed to the critical point (or percolation threshold) [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The parabolic profile also differentiates neuronal avalanches from stochastic processes with no memory, which typically display a semicircle motif 74 . Specific graph-theoretical constructs such as a hierarchical topology 40 can also mimic scale-free size distributions but fail to produce an inverted parabola profile. Network and biophysical models have demonstrated avalanches to emerge with oscillations at a particular E/I balance or topology; however, the corresponding avalanche profile was not reported 66,75,76 .…”
Section: Figs 1 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable and asymmetric profiles have been reported for neuronal cultures 35,36 , and profiles seem to depend on avalanche duration in humans 18 . Identifying the correct profile of neuronal avalanches will provide insights into the temporal evolution of brain activity, will distinguish between different models of avalanche generation [37][38][39][40] and, importantly, might provide a biomarker given recent findings that profiles predict recovery from brain insults 41,42 . A second prediction from critical theory is that the avalanche parabola can be collapsed over many avalanche durations with a scaling exponent, χ, larger than 1.5 (Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings have important implications for understanding the robustness of networks and in quantifying epidemic outbreaks in the susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model of disease spread. Percolation theories are among the most studied in network science [1], as well as in several other areas [2,3], providing insights for a broad range of applications such as robustness of a network to random failures or attacks [4], epidemics in contact processes [5], vaccination strategies [1], neuronal avalanches [6], and stability of gene regulatory networks [7]. In the simplest case of bond (or site) percolation, a fraction p of the links (nodes) are randomly chosen to be occupied and the rest of the links (nodes) are removed from the network [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%