1997
DOI: 10.1109/90.649568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical packet fair queueing algorithms

Abstract: In this paper, we propose to use the idealized Hierarchical Generalized Processor Sharing (H-GPS) model to simultaneously support guaranteed real-time, rate-adaptive besteffort, and controlled link-sharing services. We design Hierarchical Packet Fair Queueing (H-PFQ) algorithms to approximate H-GPS by using one-level variable-rate PFQ servers as basic building blocks. By computing the system virtual time and per packet virtual start/finish times in unit of bits instead of seconds, most of the PFQ algorithms in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
201
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
201
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While most of the previous research directed at providing better services in packet switching networks have focused on providing guaranteed services or protection for each individual flow, several recent works [11,39,92] have argued that it is also important to support hierarchical link-sharing service.…”
Section: Link Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While most of the previous research directed at providing better services in packet switching networks have focused on providing guaranteed services or protection for each individual flow, several recent works [11,39,92] have argued that it is also important to support hierarchical link-sharing service.…”
Section: Link Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the service complexity, it should come as no surprise that all current solutions require routers to maintain per class state [11,39,92]. A natural research direction would be to implement the link-sharing service in a SCORE network.…”
Section: Link Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, items of higher access probability are assigned to faster disks than the items of low access probability, which are assigned to slow revolving disks. Later, Jain and Werth [18] proved that the optimal expected access time results when the instances of each item to be pushed are equally spaced, while Bennett and Zhang [9] determined which packet from many input queue should be transmitted next in the output channel so that the channel is used in a fair way. The fact that the push broadcast scheduling problem was related to Packet Fair Queuing was brought up by Vaidya and Hameed in [12,14], who also studied scheduling for multiple broadcast channels and the impact of the transmission error on scheduling.…”
Section: State Of the Art: Past Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hierarchical resource sharing or dynamic storage allocation also finds its analogy in link-sharing in the network transmission context [54,82]. A content owner may have different classes of objects in its corpus, and wishes to assign different QoS levels for the different classes.…”
Section: Hierarchical Resource Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%