Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Com 2009
DOI: 10.3115/1620754.1620817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical phrase-based translation with weighted finite state transducers

Abstract: This paper describes a lattice-based decoder for hierarchical phrase-based translation. The decoder is implemented with standard WFST operations as an alternative to the well-known cube pruning procedure. We find that the use of WFSTs rather than k-best lists requires less pruning in translation search, resulting in fewer search errors, direct generation of translation lattices in the target language, better parameter optimization, and improved translation performance when rescoring with long-span language mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we describe the HiFST decoder [47,79,81]. As stated in Section 2.3.1 the CYK algorithm produces a large number of derivations that share sub-derivations.…”
Section: Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding With Wfstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we describe the HiFST decoder [47,79,81]. As stated in Section 2.3.1 the CYK algorithm produces a large number of derivations that share sub-derivations.…”
Section: Hierarchical Phrase-based Decoding With Wfstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, another alternative is a push down automata (PDA) [79]. A PDA representation can be used for a larger T at the cost of a smaller language model M.…”
Section: Apply the Language Model Via Intersectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we follow the approach of expanding this space onto a Finite-State Automata (FSA) described in (de Gispert et al, 2010;Iglesias et al, 2011). This means that in parsing, each cell M [x, y] is associated with an FSA F x,y , which encodes all the sequences generated by the grammar when covering the words marked by the bit string of that cell.…”
Section: Generation From Exact Parsingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GYRO builds on approaches developed for syntactic SMT (Chiang, 2007;de Gispert et al, 2010;Iglesias et al, 2011). The system generates strings in the form of weighted automata which can be rescored using higher-order n-gram LMs, dependency LMs (Shen et al, 2010), and Minimum Bayes Risk decoding, either using posterior probabilities obtained from GYRO or SMT systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%