2012
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Polymer Microlattice Structures

Abstract: In this paper, we describe a rapid method for fabricating a low density polymer microlattice with structural organization on two length scales. The topology of this hierarchical cellular structure is achieved through the in situ formation of a microlattice with small‐scale lattice members (≈100 µm diameter) within a microlattice with approximately 12 times larger feature sizes. Compression experiments suggest that an increase in the specific plateau stress is realized by the introduction of hierarchy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, larger thicknesses could also be fabricated by exposing the photopolymer to the 2D mask at different heights, which results in multiple layers akin to that of layer‐by‐layer fabrication in conventional 3D printing methods. SPPW has been shown to be able to fabricate lattices out of stiff, viscoelastic, and pre‐ceramic polymers . One main advantage of SPPW compared to other 3D printing methods is the ability to fabricate 3D structures at a substantially higher rate (>1 m 2 min −1 for continuous process) and scalability (fabrication area ≈0.4 m 2 ).…”
Section: Fabrication Methods: Advantages and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, larger thicknesses could also be fabricated by exposing the photopolymer to the 2D mask at different heights, which results in multiple layers akin to that of layer‐by‐layer fabrication in conventional 3D printing methods. SPPW has been shown to be able to fabricate lattices out of stiff, viscoelastic, and pre‐ceramic polymers . One main advantage of SPPW compared to other 3D printing methods is the ability to fabricate 3D structures at a substantially higher rate (>1 m 2 min −1 for continuous process) and scalability (fabrication area ≈0.4 m 2 ).…”
Section: Fabrication Methods: Advantages and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, they have opened up new areas of the material property space. This, in addition to evolving 3D printing techniques that enable their manufacturing, have motivated researchers to explore a variety of architectures (Schaedler and Carter, 2016) ranging from lattice topologies (Gibson and Ashby, 1997;Deshpande et al, 2001b;Luxner et al, 2004;Moongkhamklang et al, 2010;Vigliotti and Pasini, 2012;Zheng et al, 2014), foam-like metamaterials (Berger et al, 2017) triply periodic minimal surface geometries (Wang et al, 2011;Dalaq et al, 2016), hierarchical structures (Doty et al, 2012;Meza et al, 2015), honeycomb structures (Gibson and Ashby, 1997;Wadley, 2006;Fleck et al, 2010), and woven topologies (Erdeniz et al, 2015;Ryan et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallic lattice materials have been studied, and their specific properties and energy absorption capabilities were examined and compared with traditional sandwich core materials [5][6][7][8][9]. Specifically, hollow metallic microlattice materials based on advanced microfabrication techniques exhibited promising potential for impact protection [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Additionally, lattice composites, which are hybrids of lattice structures and fiber composites, can yield superior specific properties and populate vacant spaces in low-density regions of materials property charts [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%