Hierarchical Structure and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the Norwegian Version of the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM–5</i>

Thimm, Jens C.; Jordan, Stian; Bach, Bo

doi:10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682

Cited by 37 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This pattern may be viewed as higher‐order trait domains of the underlying structure of personality dysfunction. Notably, these three domains also resemble identified higher‐order domains in previous research on the hierarchical structure of DSM‐5‐AMPD and ICD‐11 trait domains as well as higher‐order domains of the emerging Hierarchical Structure of Psychopathology (HiTOP) …”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

Prevalence and structure of self‐other problems in SAPAS screening for personality disorder in a National Sample

Bach

Kongerslev

Simonsen

2019

Personality & Mental Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim -This study investigated the prevalence and factorial structure of personality disorder features in the general community measured with the self-report form of the Standardized Assessment of Personality -Abbreviated Scale (SAPAS-SR). Method -SAPAS-SR was administered to a Danish national community sample (N = 50,326; 53% women). The hierarchical latent structure was examined using exploratory factor analyses (EFA) for one to three levels.Results -We found that 11.3% of the community sample fulfilled the estimated screening criteria for a personality disorder, which was slightly higher for woman and younger people. As hypothesized, a two-factor model corresponded to aspects of self (e.g., being a worrier) and others (e.g., having difficulty making and keeping friends), whereas a three-factor model corresponded to trait domains of negative affectivity, detachment, and externalization. Conclusion -These findings suggest that personality disorder features play a significant role for at least one out of ten individuals in the Danish general community. Such features are primarily organized in a pattern of selfand interpersonal functioning, which is consistent with the conceptualization of core personality dysfunction in the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders and the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

Prevalence and structure of self‐other problems in SAPAS screening for personality disorder in a National Sample

Bach

Kongerslev

Simonsen

2019

Personality & Mental Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Initially, the DSM‐5 trait system was constructed using a large US treatment‐seeking community sample yielding a sound higher‐order five‐factor structure, which was subsequently replicated in a large US student sample including hierarchical structure from 1 to 5 factors . To date, the five‐factor structure of the DSM‐5 trait system has been replicated across numerous countries and cultures, including Dutch/Flemish, Canadian, Italian, German, Danish, French, Spanish, Norwegian, Swedish, Arabic and Portuguese samples, among others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structure of DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 personality domains in Iranian community sample

Lotfi

Bach

Amini

et al. 2018

Personality & Mental Health

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Relating to the current study that explored the DAPP's cross-gender and cross-cultural variation in norms, the topic of measurement invariance of the DAPP model, deserves further attention. Studies that investigated the factorial stability of the PID-5 model across populations (clinical vs. non-clinical) (38), or across different cultures (39), have shown promising results; future studies on the DAPP could build on these findings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology – Short Form for Adolescents (DAPP-SF-A): normative data for Flemish adolescents aged 16 to 21 years

Raaijmakers¹,

Polak²,

Arends³

et al. 2017

Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology -Short Form for Adolescents (DAPP-SF-A) is an ageadapted version of the DAPP Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). The psychometric properties of this questionnaire were established by Tromp and Koot. However, norming data are currently available exclusively for Dutch adolescents. Objective: The main aim of this study was to provide community-based norming data for the DAPP-SF-A in Flemish adolescents and separately for boys and girls. The second aim was to compare the Flemish norms with the Dutch norms. Method: The sample consisted of 425 adolescents (52% girls), aged 16 to 21 years (mean, 18.6; SD, 1.16), from the general Flemish population. In 2012, all respondents completed the DAPP-SF-A and the Youth Self-Report as a part of the longitudinal Flemish Study on Parenting, Personality, and Development. Results: Internal consistency reliabilities of the lower-order dimensions were acceptable to good (α ranged from 0.71 to 0.87, median=0.85, mean item-rest correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.67). The lower-order dimensions showed distinctive mean patterns for boys and girls, with higher scores for girls on Affective Instability and Insecure Attachment [effect sizes (d) were both 0.35] and higher scores for boys on all lower-order dimensions of Dissocial Behavior, Inhibitedness, and three lowerorder dimensions of Emotional Dysregulation (d ranged from 0.21 to 0.79). The comparison of the Flemish scores with the Dutch scores showed substantial inter-cultural differences (d ranged from 0.13 to 1.78). Conclusions: The DAPP-SF-A shows satisfactory reliability in a Flemish community-based sample of adolescents. Furthermore, given the differences between boys and girls, the use of gender-based norms seems appropriate. Finally, substantial differences with the Dutch general population norms warrant the use of separate norms in Flemish adolescents.

show abstract

Hierarchical Structure and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the Norwegian Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5

Cited by 37 publications

References 35 publications

Prevalence and structure of self‐other problems in SAPAS screening for personality disorder in a National Sample

Prevalence and structure of self‐other problems in SAPAS screening for personality disorder in a National Sample

Structure of DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 personality domains in Iranian community sample

The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology – Short Form for Adolescents (DAPP-SF-A): normative data for Flemish adolescents aged 16 to 21 years

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About