2007
DOI: 10.1515/htmp.2007.26.4.291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Structure of Aluminium Foams and Relation to Compression Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the same perspective, they confirm many theoretical studies and assumptions . However, the level of the observed effects is surprisingly high when considering that many previous investigations conclude that structural deviations have significantly less impact on mechanical performance than for example global density : Martin et al, based on their set of AlSiMg 0.5 and AlSi7 samples prepared using as‐received TiH 2 , assume structure‐based strength variation to reach an order of magnitude of 20% , whereas in the present study, a strength increase of roughly 50% was determined for both maximum and plateau onset strength in structurally optimized compared to reference materials at 0.5 g/cm 3 , which matches the lowest densities considered by Martin et al. (approx.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…From the same perspective, they confirm many theoretical studies and assumptions . However, the level of the observed effects is surprisingly high when considering that many previous investigations conclude that structural deviations have significantly less impact on mechanical performance than for example global density : Martin et al, based on their set of AlSiMg 0.5 and AlSi7 samples prepared using as‐received TiH 2 , assume structure‐based strength variation to reach an order of magnitude of 20% , whereas in the present study, a strength increase of roughly 50% was determined for both maximum and plateau onset strength in structurally optimized compared to reference materials at 0.5 g/cm 3 , which matches the lowest densities considered by Martin et al. (approx.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…One major step to this end is an improved understanding of the role of different structural features in determining the mechanical properties, as well as their scatter. Both, however, are influenced by several characteristics, among which Mosler et al and Martin et al suggest the following hierarchy [8,9]: (a) global density (b) foam structure (c) matrix alloy (d) foam microstructure Mu et al introduce friction between cell walls as a further mechanism influencing behavior under compressive load, which, however, becomes effective only at high strain levels beyond the stress-strain curve's typical plateau [10]. Density as the dominating aspect may be subdivided into global density and systematic density variations such as density gradients as typically induced by foam drainage, or by solidification shrinkage.…”
Section: Foam Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,9,10] based on an idealized representation of cellular structure were found to be inadequate to represent the actual profile of mechanical properties for real porous metals and metallic foams [9,10]. Different imperfections existing in real Al foams, processing additives, and variation in the testing conditions result in considerable disagreements between experimental results and theoretical predictions [10,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Thus, specification of mechanical tests for porous Al and Al foams with well-defined data related to microstructure of the cell wall material is a way to provide for validity of material verification essential for engineering design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%