2014
DOI: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Structure of Maladaptive Personality Traits in Older Adults: Joint Factor Analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ

Abstract: In DSM-5, the categorical model and criteria for the 10 personality disorders included in DSM-IV will be reprinted in Section II. Moreover, an alternative dimensional classification model will appear in Section III. This alternative DSM-5 proposal for the diagnosis of a personality disorder is based on two fundamental criteria: impairments in personality functioning (Criterion A) and the presence of pathological personality traits (Criterion B). In the maladaptive trait model that has been developed to operati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
53
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
12
53
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, against our expectations, we found no supporting evidence for the meta‐traits of stability and plasticity because facets of neuroticism and extraversion collapsed into the same higher‐order domain, while facets of agreeableness and conscientiousness formed the second domain. That is, we found two meta‐traits, termed positive emotionality and constraint, that closely matched the reversed higher‐order domains of internalizing (emotional dysregulation, negative affectivity and inhibition) and externalizing (antagonism, impulsivity and aggressiveness), which are commonly found in studies that subject inventories of pathological personality to factor‐analytic examination . These findings have important implications, as they suggest that on the highest level of the hierarchy, the Big Five traits might be better depicted by the meta‐traits of internalizing and externalizing, instead of stability and plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, against our expectations, we found no supporting evidence for the meta‐traits of stability and plasticity because facets of neuroticism and extraversion collapsed into the same higher‐order domain, while facets of agreeableness and conscientiousness formed the second domain. That is, we found two meta‐traits, termed positive emotionality and constraint, that closely matched the reversed higher‐order domains of internalizing (emotional dysregulation, negative affectivity and inhibition) and externalizing (antagonism, impulsivity and aggressiveness), which are commonly found in studies that subject inventories of pathological personality to factor‐analytic examination . These findings have important implications, as they suggest that on the highest level of the hierarchy, the Big Five traits might be better depicted by the meta‐traits of internalizing and externalizing, instead of stability and plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the course of devising this taxonomy, members of the DSM-5 Work Group on Personality and Personality Disorders developed a self-and informant-report instrument for assessing the 25 trait facets: the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012;. A growing body of research shows that the PID-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of the DSM-5 trait model, and that it is meaningfully related to a range of well-established constructs, such as general personality traits (Ashton, Lee, de Vries, Hendrickse, & Born, 2012;de Fruyt et al, 2013;Gore & Widiger, 2013;Markon et al, 2013;Quilty, Ayearst, Chmielewski, Pollock, & Bagby, 2013;Thomas et al, 2013;Watson, Stasik, Ro, & Clark, 2013), alternative conceptualizations of maladaptive personality traits (Anderson et al, 2013;van den Broeck et al, 2013;Watson et al, 2013), the DSM-IV PDs Samuel, Hopwood, Krueger, Thomas, & Ruggero, 2013), interpersonal problems , pathological beliefs , pathological narcissism (Miller, Gentile, Wilson, & Campbell, 2013;Wright et al, 2013), and psychopathy (Strickland, Drislane, Lucy, Krueger, & Patrick, 2013). The aim of the present study is to build on and extend these findings by investigating the structure and correlates of DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits in two German-speaking samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, were able to replicate the five factors of the PID-5 in a large sample of 2,461 U.S. undergraduates, as indicated by factor congruency coefficients (i.e., Tucker's phi) of .96 and greater for target-rotated factors. Moreover, de Fruyt et al (2013) and van den Broeck et al (2013) presented the Dutch version of the PID-5 to a sample of 240 Belgian psychology undergraduates and 173 older adults, respectively, and found congruency coefficients between their factors and the factors in the Krueger et al (2012) study ranging from .82 to .97. Two further studies suggest that the five-factor structure might also replicate across raters: Markon and colleagues (2013) used the self-and informant report form of the PID-5 in an elevated-risk community sample of 221 participants and found congruency coefficients between the factors of the two PID-5 forms ranging from .84 to .91.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only six prototypes of PDs (schizotypal, borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, avoidant, and obsessivecompulsive) were retained to address diagnostic overlap, based on two criteria: significant disturbances in personal and interpersonal functioning (criterion A) and the presence of one or more of the five pathological personality traits (negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism) and the 25 facets associated with these traits (criterion B). To our knowledge, only two empirical studies on the dimensional DSM-5 model have been conducted in older adults, both focusing on criterion B using the PID-5 [27,43].…”
Section: Dsm-5 Pds Sections II and Iiimentioning
confidence: 99%