2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Accuracy Detection of Neuronal Ensemble Activity in Two-Photon Functional Microscopy Using Smart Line Scanning

Abstract: Graphical AbstractHighlights d Smart line scanning (SLS) restricts imaging to the most informative image pixels d SLS substantially increases the signal-to-noise ratio of population GCaMP6 imaging d SLS leads to higher probability of detecting calcium events in population imaging d SLS achieves more precise identification of functional neuronal ensembles SUMMARY Two-photon functional imaging using genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) is one prominent tool to map neural activity. Under optimized exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For neuronal recordings, cell identification was performed on the median temporal projection of each t-series, after motion correction, by identifying rectangular boxes containing the neuronal soma of the identified neuron, as in [ 64 ]. Within the rectangular box, pixels were ranked according to the pixel signal-to-noise (SNR) using the following formula: where max F i , j (t) is the maximum fluorescence intensity of the pixel i , j , at time t , and noise i , j was computed as the standard deviation across all fluorescence values of the t-series below the 25th percentile of the fluorescence distribution of the pixel i , j [ 64 ]. Only pixels with SNR value greater than the 80th percentile of the SNR distribution were considered as part of the ROI corresponding to the considered rectangular box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For neuronal recordings, cell identification was performed on the median temporal projection of each t-series, after motion correction, by identifying rectangular boxes containing the neuronal soma of the identified neuron, as in [ 64 ]. Within the rectangular box, pixels were ranked according to the pixel signal-to-noise (SNR) using the following formula: where max F i , j (t) is the maximum fluorescence intensity of the pixel i , j , at time t , and noise i , j was computed as the standard deviation across all fluorescence values of the t-series below the 25th percentile of the fluorescence distribution of the pixel i , j [ 64 ]. Only pixels with SNR value greater than the 80th percentile of the SNR distribution were considered as part of the ROI corresponding to the considered rectangular box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral injections were performed either on pups (P1 - P2, with P0 indicating the day of birth) or in young adults (>P28) similarly to Brondi et al, 2020 ; Zucca et al, 2019 . Briefly, P1 – P2 injection of stCoChR-NLS:eGFP were performed on pups previously anaesthetized via hypothermia and immobilized on a refrigerated stereotaxic apparatus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in stimuli are modeled as differences in the strength and time pattern of the neural responses they elicit, as explained next. The two stimuli could elicit a time-averaged spike rate (SR) along the trial of either [126]). Spike trains and ΔF/F traces were always generated at a sampling rate of 1 kHz, and the latter were then subsampled to the desired sampling rate.…”
Section: Effect Of Neuronal Firing and Experimental Conditions On Inf...mentioning
confidence: 99%