AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-4886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model (HASDM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
117
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These projects were inspired by publications about the US Air Force Space Command's HASDM project [e.g., Storz et al, 2002;Casali and Barker, 2002]. The US researchers demonstrated the successful application of the concept of empirical density model calibration, in which density observations derived from satellite tracking data are used to compute corrections to empirical density models, at regular time intervals.…”
Section: Objectives and Motivations Of The Esa Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These projects were inspired by publications about the US Air Force Space Command's HASDM project [e.g., Storz et al, 2002;Casali and Barker, 2002]. The US researchers demonstrated the successful application of the concept of empirical density model calibration, in which density observations derived from satellite tracking data are used to compute corrections to empirical density models, at regular time intervals.…”
Section: Objectives and Motivations Of The Esa Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowman et al [2008] validated this conjecture by comparing Dst-based predictions of T ∞ SW (t) and r th (h, t) with values inferred from accelerometers on the GRACE and Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellites during magnetic storms in 2004 and 2005 as well as with densities obtained from the drag exerted on 75 LEO reference satellites. The latter information is encapsulated in the High Accuracy Satellite Determination Model (HASDM) [Casali et al, 2002;Storz et al, 2002]. Using Dst as a driver, Bowman et al [2008] demonstrated that predicted storm time density errors fell from >65% to about 15% with respect to HASDM predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowman et al [2008] [Storz et al, 2002]. Bowman et al [2008] concluded that the Dst index is a more accurate parameter than ap for estimating the thermospheric states during large magnetic storms and that it should be considered as a replacement in operational models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%