High Adherence to Oral Nutrition Supplements Prescribed by Dietitians: A Cross‐Sectional Study on Hospital Outpatients

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess adherence to oral nutrition supplements (ONS) among hospital outpatients and to assess patient characteristics, experiences of ONS, and the characteristics of ONS prescriptions in clinical practice.MethodsHospital outpatients aged ≥18 years and prescribed ONS by a dietitian at a Swedish hospital were referred to the study from September 2016 to February 2017. Data were collected from structured telephone interviews, medical records, and a register of ONS delivered. Adherence to ONS was measured by dividing self‐reported intake of ONS (frequency question and 24‐hour recall question) by the amount prescribed and using the medication possession ratio (MPR).ResultsOf the 96 patients included (mean age 67 ± 13 years), 52% were male. The 2 most frequent medical diagnoses were malignancy and digestive system disease. Mean adherence to ONS was 93% measured by the frequency question, 87% measured by the 24‐hour recall question, and 76% according to MPR. The majority of the patients (83%) were prescribed 1–3 bottles of ONS/day. The average number of flavors of ONS delivered was 4.2. Before prescription, 69% of the patients had been allowed to taste the ONS and 92% had chosen the flavors to be prescribed. Over 75% liked the taste of the ONS and considered them to be good for their health.ConclusionsAdherence to ONS was high in this population, which might be explained by the individual tailoring of ONS prescriptions by a dietitian, positive experiences of ONS, and the relatively young mean age of the participants.

Assessment of compliance with oral nutritional supplementation and exploration of barriers and facilitators for patients after gastrectomy: A mixed‐methods study

“…Truncated adherence scales are often used in other medication compliance studies (Sattler et al, 2013). This method was considered suitable because for patients who are undernourished or at nutritional risk, consuming more ONS than the prescribed amount is considered beneficial and harmless (Liljeberg et al, 2019).…”

The dietary supplement chitosan lowers serum phosphorus in a hemodialysis patient not tolerating prescription medications

“…The patient did not tolerate several prescriptions phosphorus binders but had no issues with chitosan. In general, compliance with dietary supplements is considered higher (up to 90%) than compliance with prescription of phosphorus binders 18 . Taking a dietary supplement for weight loss together with food may be psychologically more attractive than remembering to take prescription drugs several times a day.…”

Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of malnutrition management and oral nutritional supplement prescribing in the community: A qualitative study

“…The cost of inappropriate ONS prescribing has been raised in many jurisdictions and leads to both economic wastage and poor patient outcomes [21,24,41]. In response, some health systems (e.g., Sweden and the UK) have moved forward with a formal role for dietitian prescribing within their own scope of practice [42,43]. There is evidence to support such practices as dietitian involvement in management can improve ONS compliance, reduce hospital readmission in older patients, reduce malnutrition-associated healthcare costs and reduce ONS cost inefficiencies [13,21,42,44,45].…”