Editorial
951W ith reported incidences typically ≈1%, 1 swimminginduced pulmonary edema (SIPE) is increasingly recognized as a not uncommon syndrome that is triggered by strenuous swimming and characterized by dyspnea, cough, and hemoptysis. Interestingly, SIPE shares common features with another form of pulmonary edema that is caused by strenuous exercise in an evolutionary nonphysiological habitat, namely high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE): Both SIPE and HAPE typically affect young healthy individuals, are triggered by strenuous exercise in a cold environment, resolve spontaneously after return to physiological conditions, yet will recur on reexposure in prone individuals.2,3 At the pathological level, edema fluid in both SIPE and HAPE patients contains considerable amounts of red blood cells and high-molecular-weight proteins in the absence of markedly elevated inflammatory markers. 4,5 The pathophysiology of both diseases has long puzzled the field and hampered the development of effective counterstrategies, because their features tend to evade the traditional classification of pulmonary edema.
Article, see p 988The classic Starling equation defines net fluid flow J v across the capillary barrier aswhere L p is hydraulic conductivity (a measure of water permeability), A is the barrier surface area, σ π is the oncotic reflection coefficient (a measure of the barrier´s resistance to protein movement), and P c , P i , Π c , and Π i are the hydrostatic (P) and oncotic (Π) pressures in the capillary (c) or interstitial (i) compartment, respectively. Accordingly, we differentiate between 2 classes of pulmonary edema, namely hydrostatic edema caused by increased driving pressure (increased ΔP or reduced ΔΠ), and permeability-type edema caused by high L p or low σ π and traditionally considered a result of infectious or sterile inflammation. The dilemma emerges because the lack of inflammatory markers in SIPE or early HAPE argues against a classic permeability-type edema, whereas the regular presence of red blood cells and high-molecular-weight proteins disagrees with the traditional concept of hydrostatic pulmonary edema.In this issue of Circulation, a seminal study by Moon and colleagues 6 now sheds new light on the pathomechanisms driving SIPE. In 10 subjects with a previous history of SIPE, pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics, expired gas volume and fractions, and blood gases were monitored at supine dry rest (baseline), after submersion in 18 to 20°C cold water, and during moderate cycle ergometer exercise while submersed. In comparison with a historical control of 20 healthy subjects, SIPE-susceptible subjects had higher mean pulmonary artery pressures (mPAP) and pulmonary artery wedge pressures (PAWP) during submersed exercise despite lower cardiac output (CO). These findings are reminiscent of studies in HAPE-susceptible subjects that show an exaggerated mPAP response to HAPE-relevant triggers such as hypoxia and exercise.7 None of the subjects showed signs of recurrent SIPE. Although a direct cause-effect...