2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2003.tb02714.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High– and Low–Alcohol‐Preferring Mice Show Differences in Conditioned Taste Aversion to Alcohol

Abstract: These data suggest that mice selectively bred for low alcohol preference are more sensitive to the development of alcohol CTA than mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference. The present findings indicate that common genes mediate both alcohol preference and the aversive effects of alcohol as measured in the CTA paradigm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the aforementioned role of meetings in fundamentally understanding and experiencing organizational life. If a stimulus is sufficiently powerful (as we argue for meetings above), even less frequent events are sometimes enough to impact well-being (e.g., Brooks, Bowker, Anderson, & Palmatier, 2003;Chester, Lumeng, Li, & Grahame, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This may be due to the aforementioned role of meetings in fundamentally understanding and experiencing organizational life. If a stimulus is sufficiently powerful (as we argue for meetings above), even less frequent events are sometimes enough to impact well-being (e.g., Brooks, Bowker, Anderson, & Palmatier, 2003;Chester, Lumeng, Li, & Grahame, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This procedure was performed according to established protocols (Risinger and Boyce, 2002;Chester et al, 2003). Animals were housed singly and acclimatized to limited water access by allowing them access to water for decreasing periods of time (10,8,6, and 4 hr per day on subsequent days), followed by 2 hr daily access for 1 week.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having established that the rewarding effects of ethanol are altered in Ca v 2.2 null mice, we next investigated the aversive properties of ethanol using a conditioned taste aversion assay with ethanol as the unconditioned stimulus and 1.2% NaCl as the CS. Using 1.2% NaCl as the CS is thought to measure genuine aversion to ethanol, rather than reward, which may be measured using saccharin as the CS (Grigson, 1997;Risinger and Boyce, 2002;Chester et al, 2003). After commencement of ethanol treatment, both genotypes rapidly developed conditioned taste aversion.…”
Section: Conditioned Taste Aversion Is Attenuated In Ca V 22 Null Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple intrinsic factors can contribute to these behavioral differences. Some of these factors may be related to individual differences in evaluating CS and US (Scheiner et al 1999;Chester et al 2003). These differences could reflect genetic heterogeneity at the individual level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%