High anticancer activity in short response time exhibited by a new azobenzene derivative and its copper complex

Abstract

o‐Aminoazotoluene (OAT), capable of photoisomerization, and o‐vanillin, a potent comutagen, have been used to synthesize a new ligand, HL, [C6H4(CH3)N=NC6H3(CH3)N=CHC6H3(OH)(OCH3)], which, upon complexation with copper(II), results in a new copper(II) complex‐Cu(L)2, [Cu{C6H4(CH3)N=NC6H3(CH3)N=CHC6H3(OCH3)O}2]. Both HL and Cu(L)2 have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction measurements along with other analytical techniques, for example, IR spectroscopy, NMR spectroscopy, UV–Vis spectroscopy, elemental analysis and mass spectrometry. These compounds were tested with different in vitro anticancer assay as well as with in silico studies. A comparative study has been demonstrated on anticancer activity of HL and Cu(L)2 with the ligand HAZ, {C6H5N=NC6H4N=CHC6H3(OH)(OCH3)} and its Cu‐complex, [Cu(AZ)2, Cu{C6H5N=NC6H4N=CHC6H3(OCH3)O}2]. The sensing properties of HAZ, along with the synthesis and structural properties of both HAZ and Cu(AZ)2, have been reported by our group earlier. Cytotoxicity measurements on MCF7 cell lines show that Cu(L)2 and Cu(AZ)2 have higher anticancer activity than their corresponding ligands. The apoptotic effect of Cu‐complex was studied through nuclear fragmentation assay and AO/EB dual‐staining assay on MCF7 cell line. The IC50 value of Cu(L)2 in 0.01% DMSO/water after 24‐h treatment was found 4.2 μM, which is one of the lowest values with this response time compared to the other analogous anticancer compounds. Finally, we have evaluated the expression of hERα protein with respect to Cu‐complexes, and it was observed that Cu(L)2 caused more down‐regulation of hERα as compared to Cu(AZ)2.