2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.032013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-brightness X-ray free-electron laser with an optical undulator by pulse shaping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-power IR laser pulse used for ICS is equivalent to a static undulator in this x-ray performance estimate. This is physically correct if the laser field is uniform, a challenging issue for which solutions [38][39][40] …”
Section: X-ray Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-power IR laser pulse used for ICS is equivalent to a static undulator in this x-ray performance estimate. This is physically correct if the laser field is uniform, a challenging issue for which solutions [38][39][40] …”
Section: X-ray Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main result is expressed in Eq. (5), but before we discuss it, we would like to emphasize that at the practical level, the required pulse shaping can be done in several ways: spatial light modulators, adaptive beam shaping, or fixed masks [30].…”
Section: Laser Pulse Taperingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very short periods can be provided by in-vacuum undulators and can be as short as 15 mm, with K  1, typically at the expense of a very small tuning range in K. Equation (1) is used to deduce a beam energy of 1.7 GeV (alternatively, we could have chosen, e.g., K  2 to obtain a beam energy comparable to that estimated in the previous approaches, but with a much higher radiation flux). It is worth mentioning that other, more recent solutions for shortening the undulator period and therefore using electron bunches with much lower energy, could be considered for a more aggressive, cost-effective FEL design, such as microwave, superconducting, and optical undulators [44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Cost-driven Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%