2018
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201701481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐capacity protein A affinity chromatography for the fast quantification of antibodies: Two‐wavelength detection expands linear range

Abstract: The high‐throughput analysis of antibodies from processes can be enhanced when the linear range is expanded and sample preparation is kept to a minimum. We developed a fast chromatography method based on a hexameric variant of staphylococcal protein A immobilized on Toyopearl matrix, TSK 5 PW using two wavelengths. A protocol with 5 min runtime and a single‐wavelength detection at 280 nm yielded an upper limit of quantification of 2.10 mg/mL and a lower limit of quantification of 0.06 mg/mL. The optimized meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inherent variability of Protein A titer assays is an ongoing challenge encountered across the industry. As reported by Satzer and Jungbauer (2018), the relative standard deviation of a Protein A titer assay is 20% for lower limit of quantitation, and 15% for the entire concentration range. Given the nature of the intra‐assay variability of Protein A titer assays, the observed inter‐assay variability between the three modes of analysis is within the inherent variability of the method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inherent variability of Protein A titer assays is an ongoing challenge encountered across the industry. As reported by Satzer and Jungbauer (2018), the relative standard deviation of a Protein A titer assay is 20% for lower limit of quantitation, and 15% for the entire concentration range. Given the nature of the intra‐assay variability of Protein A titer assays, the observed inter‐assay variability between the three modes of analysis is within the inherent variability of the method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…exhibits the comparability of batch bioreactor titer results from different modes of analysis, including online, at-line, and offline.The apparent differences between the three modes of analysis are within the variability of titer measurements using the Protein A method.The inherent variability of Protein A titer assays is an ongoing challenge encountered across the industry. As reported bySatzer and Jungbauer (2018), the relative standard deviation of a Protein A titer assay is 20% for lower limit of quantitation, and 15% for the entire concentration range. Given the nature of the intra-assay variability of Protein A titer assays, the observed inter-assay variability between the three modes of analysis is within the inherent variability of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A compromise must be made in order to keep the number of experiments to a reasonable number. A cv of 0.03 would represent a method with high precision, such as high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and a cv of 0.15 would represent a method such as enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target molecule in this study was protein A, which is a surface protein on the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus . This bacterial protein is the most important ligand used in commercial activities for the purification of monoclonal antibodies (Palombo, Falco, Tortora, Cassani, & Fassina, ; Alkan, Bereli, Baysal, & Denizli, ; Satzer & Jungbauer, ; Tustian, Endicott, Adams, Mattila, & Bak, ; Salimi, Usta, Koçer, Çelik, & Tuncel, ; Pan, Xue, Wang, Xie, & Wu, ; Xue, Pan, Xie, Wang, & Zhang, ). Since publication of the first reports of the use of protein A as a stationary phase to purify antibodies more than 40 years ago, protein A has become the industry standard for monoclonal antibody purification for clinical use (Brechmann et al, ; Butcher et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%