“…Beyond the lack of absolute or relative measures of validity, reliability, or feasibility of some PSEEs 28 , 29 , 42 , 43 , 54 , 58 , 62 , 63 , 77 , 79 or the only partial validation of other PSEEs, 33 , 41 , 53 , 59 , 66 , 68 , 83 other limitations included the following: low sensitivity of the tool due to a small number of portion options or photos 11 , 17 , 25 , 26 , 29 , 32 , 40 , 43 , 52 , 55 , 65 ; grouping of mixed dishes and omission of food items in questionnaires 27 , 35 , 42 ; lack of breadth 28 ; requirement for high level of staff training or involvement 33 , 37 , 64 , 68 ; requirement for participants to be literate or skilled in operating equipment 33 , 37 or in performing numerical calculations 30 ; requirement for participants to possess specific technology 29 ; long time elapsed between dietary assessment with the new PSEE and the comparison method (which effectively means the 2 methods were comparing different things), or long time elapsed between test and re-test evaluations 26 , 38 , 40 ; and testing of PSEE in only one gender or age group 17 , 25 , 30–32 , 36–38 , 55 , 56 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 83 , 79 . Other issues were validation conducted in nonminority ethnic group populations 30 , 41 ; low retention rates 41 , 43 ; study not powered to detect ethnic subgroup differences 29 or validity/reliability 38 , …”