2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2034-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High complication rate after total knee and hip replacement due to perioperative bridging of anticoagulant therapy based on the 2012 ACCP guideline

Abstract: This study shows an alarmingly high complication rate in patients receiving LMWH bridging during elective TKA or THA surgery. All complications seem to be caused by, or secondary to bleeding. Patients need to be consulted about the risk of bleeding complications, and the risk of bleeding needs to be balanced over the risk of TE complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the signifi cantly higher incidence of bleeding complications and insignifi cant difference in the incidence of ischaemic complications in patients after THA or TKA compared to patients after other orthopaedic procedures, we can ask whether consistent perioperative anticoagulation prophylaxis in patients with arthroplasty may be the reason for the reduced incidence of ischaemic complications or the cause of increased incidence of bleeding complications (4,5,7,12,15,16). We cannot answer this speculative question based on the results achieved in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the signifi cantly higher incidence of bleeding complications and insignifi cant difference in the incidence of ischaemic complications in patients after THA or TKA compared to patients after other orthopaedic procedures, we can ask whether consistent perioperative anticoagulation prophylaxis in patients with arthroplasty may be the reason for the reduced incidence of ischaemic complications or the cause of increased incidence of bleeding complications (4,5,7,12,15,16). We cannot answer this speculative question based on the results achieved in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We believe this to be especially due to the fact that considerable resection of connective tissue and signifi cant exposure of spongy bone occur after both procedures, meaning that perioperative and subsequent postoperative blood losses are signifi cant in both THA and TKA. Moreover, perioperative anticoagulation prophylaxis, which is recommended in all these patients, is consistently applied in our patients using low-molecular-weight heparins (2,12). Other procedures performed in patients of the study group included also surgeries where higher perioperative blood losses are seen (scoliosis, arthroplasty of the shoulder, internal fi xation of the pelvic fracture); however, the number of these procedures was considerably lower in our group compared to procedures associated with minimum perioperative bleeding (cerclage of the olecranon, open reduction and internal fi xation for forearm fractures, proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw for hip fractures, cerclage of the patella, non-reamed tibial nail for tibial fractures, open reduction and internal fi xation for ankle fractures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013, Leijtens et al. 2014). In the present study, MBs occurred in less than 2% of bridged patients, despite the fact that THA and TKA may be considered to be high-risk procedures (Douketis et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with 2 other small cohort studies in THA and TKA, which had major bleeding rates of 92% and 33% (Leijtens et al. 2014, Haighton et al. 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leijtens et al . found a 92% incidence of major bleeding complications after joint replacement associated with bridging anticoagulation utilizing the 2012 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines . Similarly, a large observational cohort study of patients with coronary stents who underwent non‐cardiac surgery documented a 9.5% incidence of bleeding complications, nearly all of which were deemed major and required reoperation in 18.5% of cases in which bleeding occurred.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%