2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-19539-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High content analysis identifies unique morphological features of reprogrammed cardiomyocytes

Abstract: Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes is a promising approach for cardiac regeneration but still faces challenges in efficiently generating mature cardiomyocytes. Systematic optimization of reprogramming protocols requires scalable, objective methods to assess cellular phenotype beyond what is captured by transcriptional signatures alone. To address this question, we automatically segmented reprogrammed cardiomyocytes from immunofluorescence images and analyzed cell morphology. We also introd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of the actin co-stain, α-actinin pixels can no longer be classified as z-lines or off-target staining, and ZlineDetection can no longer decouple these two metrics and instead reports the simple α-actinin OOP that has been used previously [5,18,30,32]. Existing algorithms that quantify sarcomere architecture from only a z-line stain, isolate z-lines from off-target staining by using signal processing to identify double wavelets in an image [72], quantify local, micron-scale organization [73], or manually remove off-target staining [5,18,30,32]. These previous works have used a range of metrics to then classify tissue or cell architecture, many of which describe similar properties to those provided by ZlineDetection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the absence of the actin co-stain, α-actinin pixels can no longer be classified as z-lines or off-target staining, and ZlineDetection can no longer decouple these two metrics and instead reports the simple α-actinin OOP that has been used previously [5,18,30,32]. Existing algorithms that quantify sarcomere architecture from only a z-line stain, isolate z-lines from off-target staining by using signal processing to identify double wavelets in an image [72], quantify local, micron-scale organization [73], or manually remove off-target staining [5,18,30,32]. These previous works have used a range of metrics to then classify tissue or cell architecture, many of which describe similar properties to those provided by ZlineDetection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These previous works have used a range of metrics to then classify tissue or cell architecture, many of which describe similar properties to those provided by ZlineDetection. For example, the local sarcomere organization algorithm developed by Sutcliffe et al [73] scored isolated cells without actin co-staining (Figs 4 and 6d in Sutcliffe et al [73]) with a sarcomere organization index, which ranges from 0-2. The sarcomere organization index [73] was~0.1 for a primary cell they qualitatively classified as "disorganized", but~0.4 for both a "well-organized" primary cell and a reprogrammed cardiomyocyte, even though the latter had disorganized myofibrils and some α-actinin punctate patterns indicative of premyofibrils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a second step, we implemented a previously described global alignment measurement (Sutcliffe et al, 2018) that captured the large-scale alignment of myofibrils, an important attribute of overall structural organization of cardiomyocytes that is not captured by the local structural metric. The three global order parameters comprising this measurement describe the regularity, alignment, and spacing of the myofibrils within each individual cell independently of the total number or density of myofibrils (Supplemental Figure 3J-K).…”
Section: Cardiomyocytes Show Discernable Stages In Myofibrillar Organmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…148),165), 177) The analysis of miRNAs in other direct reprogramming methods may result in their improvement. Other molecular and cellular analyses, such as signal transduction, 174),183),197) metabolic remodeling, 198) time-lapse imaging, 170) and cell morphological studies, 168) have been performed. Recently, single-cell analyses, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), have been performed in many direct reprogramming studies.…”
Section: Continuedmentioning
confidence: 99%