2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High dead-live mismatch in richness of molluscan assemblages from carbonate tidal flats in the Persian (Arabian) Gulf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…abundance-weighting emphasizes the traits of dominant species, reducing the influence of rare taxa, even if they had distinct functional properties; (b) the number of scored trait modalities is limited (23 in this study) and therefore less sensitive to the effects of timeaveraging than taxonomic richness; and (c) the offset occurs in both highly (e.g., station SG30) and minimally time-averaged (e.g., hard substrate stations) death assemblages (Supporting Information Figure S1.2). This reasoning is supported by findings of high fidelity in feeding guild structure even for death assemblages whose taxonomic richness was greatly inflated compared to corresponding living assemblages (García-Ramos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Interpreting Present-day Trait Patterns With a Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 66%
“…abundance-weighting emphasizes the traits of dominant species, reducing the influence of rare taxa, even if they had distinct functional properties; (b) the number of scored trait modalities is limited (23 in this study) and therefore less sensitive to the effects of timeaveraging than taxonomic richness; and (c) the offset occurs in both highly (e.g., station SG30) and minimally time-averaged (e.g., hard substrate stations) death assemblages (Supporting Information Figure S1.2). This reasoning is supported by findings of high fidelity in feeding guild structure even for death assemblages whose taxonomic richness was greatly inflated compared to corresponding living assemblages (García-Ramos et al, 2016).…”
Section: Interpreting Present-day Trait Patterns With a Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 66%
“…Wide differences of this parameter have been controlled by the early cementation, lateral mixing, strong bioturbation, and low sedimentation rates. The obtained results have suggested that the average times in carbonate tidal flats are higher if compared with the times affecting the subtidal carbonate environments [50].…”
Section: Facies Analysis and Paleoecologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Important proxies to carry out these reconstructions include the charcoal and pollens, particularly applied in paleolakes and peats. Some main paleoecological studies have been carried out in the Persian Gulf [49,50]. Abdolmaleki stated as the Permo-Triassic boundary represents one of the most important mass extinctions during the history of the earth, marking for a strong decrease of the living taxa.…”
Section: Facies Analysis and Paleoecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation of a species present living, but not in the death assemblage is unusual and normally explained by rarity of occurrence or poor preservability (e.g., Callender & Powell, 2000;Albano, 2014;Martinelli, Madin, & Kosnik, 2016), neither of which is true for Atlantic surfclams in the surveyed region. Long postmortem shell half-lives impose taphonomic inertia into the system which permits the death assemblage to track the history of occupation (Kidwell, 2008;Poirier, Sauriau, Chaumillon, & Bertin, 2010), but which also imposes a time delay between initial colonization and representation in the death assemblage (Olszewski, 2012) and a variable signal of range relinquishment depending on the degree of time averaging (e.g., Perry, 1996;García-Ramos, Albano, Harzhauser, Piller, & Zuschin, 2016). No evidence of range relinquishment exists in this survey despite the wealth of evidence of such farther to the south (Powell et al, 2019), whereas range expansion is documented by multiple evidences including differential size frequencies shallow and deep (large vs. small surfclams), and varying distributions of surfclam shell content.…”
Section: Surfclam Range Shift Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%