“…The observation of a species present living, but not in the death assemblage is unusual and normally explained by rarity of occurrence or poor preservability (e.g., Callender & Powell, 2000;Albano, 2014;Martinelli, Madin, & Kosnik, 2016), neither of which is true for Atlantic surfclams in the surveyed region. Long postmortem shell half-lives impose taphonomic inertia into the system which permits the death assemblage to track the history of occupation (Kidwell, 2008;Poirier, Sauriau, Chaumillon, & Bertin, 2010), but which also imposes a time delay between initial colonization and representation in the death assemblage (Olszewski, 2012) and a variable signal of range relinquishment depending on the degree of time averaging (e.g., Perry, 1996;García-Ramos, Albano, Harzhauser, Piller, & Zuschin, 2016). No evidence of range relinquishment exists in this survey despite the wealth of evidence of such farther to the south (Powell et al, 2019), whereas range expansion is documented by multiple evidences including differential size frequencies shallow and deep (large vs. small surfclams), and varying distributions of surfclam shell content.…”