2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00197-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High density ERP indices of conscious and unconscious semantic priming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This sort of inconsistency between the behavioral and the electrophysiological findings is actually consistent with previous ERP research on the N400 effect (Ruz, Madrid, Lupiánez, & Tudela, 2003;Brown & Hagoort, 1993;Holcomb, 1993). For example, Brown and Hagoort (1993) found that incongruent masked primes produced slower RTs to targets than congruent masked primes, but this effect was not carried over in the electrophysiological data-there was no corresponding N400 effect for masked incongruent items.…”
Section: Gesture-speech Integration Is Not An Exclusively Automatic Psupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This sort of inconsistency between the behavioral and the electrophysiological findings is actually consistent with previous ERP research on the N400 effect (Ruz, Madrid, Lupiánez, & Tudela, 2003;Brown & Hagoort, 1993;Holcomb, 1993). For example, Brown and Hagoort (1993) found that incongruent masked primes produced slower RTs to targets than congruent masked primes, but this effect was not carried over in the electrophysiological data-there was no corresponding N400 effect for masked incongruent items.…”
Section: Gesture-speech Integration Is Not An Exclusively Automatic Psupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Some variables associated to early modulations are lexical features (Sereno, Rayner, & Posner, 1998;Dehaene, 1995), word frequency (Sereno, Brewer, & O'Donnell, 2003;, or even semantic factors (Pulvermuller, Assadollahi, & Elbert, 2001). Along the same lines, repetition, phonological, and semantic priming effects have been reported during similar time windows (Holcomb & Grainger, 2006;Proverbio et al, 2004;Ruz, Madrid, Lupiáñez, & Tudela, 2003;Abdullaev & Posner, 1998). These effects of stimulus attributes suggest that the language system in the brain is tuned to extract some word-related characteristics at a very fast pace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Two components are known to be related to semantic priming: a negative component peaking 400 ms after stimulus onset, the "N400" (Kutas & Hillyard, 1980, 1982, 1989Kutas & Van Petten, 1988;Van Petten, 1995), and a positive component appearing later called "Late Positive Complex" (LPC) (Besson & Kutas, 1993;Cameli & Phillips, 2000;Curran, Tucker, Kutas, & Posner, 1993;Juottonen, Revonsuo, & Lang, 1996;Kostova, Passerieux, Laurent, Saint-Georges, & Hardy-Bayle, 2003;Misra & Holcomb, 2003;Miyamoto, Katayama, & Koyama, 1998;Nigam, Hoffman, & Simons, 1992;Radeau, Besson, Fonteneau, & Castro, 1998;Salmon & Pratt, 2002;Sitnikova, Kuperberg, & Holcomb, 2003). The semantic priming indexed by the N400 seems to be generated by implicit (e.g., Anderson & Holcomb, 1995;Connolly, Phillips, Stewart, & Brake, 1992;Deacon, Uhm, Ritter, Hewitt, & Dynowska, 1999;Deacon, Hewitt, Yang, & Nagata, 2000;Holcomb, 1988Holcomb, , 1993Kiefer, 2002;Kiefer & Spitzer, 2000;Misra & Holcomb, 2003;Schnyer, Allen, & Forster, 1997;Stenberg, Lindgren, Johansson, Olsson, & Rosen, 2000) and explicit (e.g., Brown & Hagoort, 1993;Ruz, Madrid, Lupanez, & Tudela, 2003) processes. Unlike the N400 effect (i.e., ERP to incongruent minus ERP to congruent targets), the LPC effect would relate only to explicit processing with the activation of a postlexical integrative mechanism (Juottonen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%