2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐density impulse noise detection and removal using deep convolutional neural network with particle swarm optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism shows significantly better results in terms of edge preservation and noise suppression. Khaw et al [74] have used an efficient CNN with particle swarm optimization (PSO) for high-density impulse noise removal. This high-density impulse noise detection and removal model mainly consists of two parts: impulse noise removal and impulse noisy pixel detection for restoration.…”
Section: B Methodologies Of Cnn-based Models (Impulse Noise)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism shows significantly better results in terms of edge preservation and noise suppression. Khaw et al [74] have used an efficient CNN with particle swarm optimization (PSO) for high-density impulse noise removal. This high-density impulse noise detection and removal model mainly consists of two parts: impulse noise removal and impulse noisy pixel detection for restoration.…”
Section: B Methodologies Of Cnn-based Models (Impulse Noise)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al [31] utilized Laplacian scale mixture (LSM) modeling and nonlocal low-rank regularization to remove mixture noise efficiently. In [32], a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture and particle swarm optimization are adopted to detect impulse noise pixels accurately, and the median Filter is used to clean noise pixels. Wang et al [33] introduced a low-rank prior in small oriented noise-free image patches, then integrated low-rank and sparse matrix recovery to detect and remove nonpointwise random-valued impulse noise simultaneously.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case II: If N8 has 0 or 255 greater than one then expand window size to 5 × 5 to check for any possible edge 16 figure 1: 5 × 5 window Let the pixel under processing is "v 0 " as shown in fig 1.The adjacent pixels are denoted as v 1 to v 24 . The following rules are utilized to cross-check whether the pixel needs to be restored or not.…”
Section: If Count1 ≥ 3 or Count2 ≥ 3 Then Take A 3 × 3 Windowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Schulte et.al.utilized the image histogram to find out impulse noise in color images [14].In addition with the histogram, fuzzy K-means clustering along with fuzzy-support vector machine (FSVM) classifier is used in [15].Many histogram-based fuzzy filters and fuzzy median filters perform effectively in terms of detection of impulse noise but proper restoration of noisy pixel is not achieved.It results in high false alarm(FA) rates.Edges present in an image are often detected as impulse noise which gives rise to greater miss detection(MD) rates. In the recent years, various neuro-fuzzy filters along with evolutionary algorithms have evolved to deal with impulse noise and edge detection such as techniques based on Particle swarm optimization(PSO) [16,17],ant colony optimization [18] and bacterial foraging [19,20] by Verma et.al. Neuro-fuzzy filter with optimized intelligent water drop technique presented by Devi and Soranamageswari in [21] and many more.Neuro-fuzzy filters provide fair results but are complex in nature with increased computational time and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%