2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Density Nanoporous carbon materials as storage material for Methane: A value-added solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[8]. Nevertheless, their performance has been comparable to the best performing MOFs due to which they remain potential materials for application [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8]. Nevertheless, their performance has been comparable to the best performing MOFs due to which they remain potential materials for application [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Porous carbons, on the other hand, are more amenable to densification/compaction with retention of porosity and gravimetric gas uptake. 26–31 Alternative approaches have explored the use of binders to improve the packing density of porous carbons, 32 or the synthesis of monolithic forms of activated carbons. 33…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Porous carbons, on the other hand, are more amenable to densification/compaction with retention of porosity and gravimetric gas uptake. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Alternative approaches have explored the use of binders to improve the packing density of porous carbons, 32 or the synthesis of monolithic forms of activated carbons. 33 Despite a great deal of on-going and previous research, there appears to be a limit to the packing density (and consequently volumetric gas uptake) that can be achieved by MOFs and purely carbonaceous carbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, solid-state materials are considered as promising storage media due to their properties such as high surface area, low density, and high thermal and chemical stability compared to compressed and liquefied storage systems. [13][14][15] Various porous solids such as silica, zeolites, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, graphene and composites of these materials have been used for the storage of gaseous fuels with improved storage capacity. 16,17 Nevertheless, these materials suffer from slow kinetics, poor reversibility, energy-intensive synthesis and poor reproducibility in storage capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%