2013
DOI: 10.1002/ggge.20058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High density of structurally controlled, shallow to deep water fluid seep indicators imaged offshore Costa Rica

Abstract: [1] We used high-resolution mapping to document 161 sites of potential fluid seepage on the shelf and slope regions where no geophysical seep indicators had been reported. Identified potential seabed seepage sites show both high-backscatter anomalies and bathymetric expressions, such as pockmarks, mounds, and ridges. Almost all identified seabed features are associated with bright spots and flat spots beneath, as mapped within the 3-D seismic grid. We obtained EM122 multi-beam data using closely spaced receive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the Structures From the 2-D Seismic Profile BGR99-7 at Site U1380 Normal faulting is supported by the structure of the fault zones and normal fault stress regime observed from the drilled cores [Harris et al, 2013b] and is also consistent with the dense pattern of interpreted normal faults in the outer shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, backscatter, and 3-D seismic data [Kluesner et al, 2013;Bangs et al, 2015Bangs et al, , 2016. The missing material (800 6 70 m) across the MSR (section 5.1) could possibly all be due to normal fault offset (250 6 70 m) with no mass movement.…”
Section: Integration Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…With the Structures From the 2-D Seismic Profile BGR99-7 at Site U1380 Normal faulting is supported by the structure of the fault zones and normal fault stress regime observed from the drilled cores [Harris et al, 2013b] and is also consistent with the dense pattern of interpreted normal faults in the outer shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, backscatter, and 3-D seismic data [Kluesner et al, 2013;Bangs et al, 2015Bangs et al, , 2016. The missing material (800 6 70 m) across the MSR (section 5.1) could possibly all be due to normal fault offset (250 6 70 m) with no mass movement.…”
Section: Integration Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A fault zone near the base of the sediment cover would mechanically detach the sediments from the deeper margin wedge, and the principal stress directions could be dominantly controlled by the pattern of normal faults in the sediment cover. Decoupling of the sediment cover from the deep stress field is also supported by the observation that the S Hmax azimuth in U1413 is the same as that above 865 mbsf in U1379, although the stress field beneath U1413 should be affected by the subduction of a seamount [ Kluesner et al ., ]. If a network of faults with different orientations dissects the sediment cover in a number of separate blocks, principal stress directions can be different in different blocks and may rotate near faults within a block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Drilling and seismic surveys along the margin suggest active and long‐term tectonic erosion [ Ranero and von Huene , ; Ranero et al ., ; Vannucchi et al ., , , ]. Active fluid venting documented by ubiquitous mud mounds and seepages is widespread along strike [ Sahling et al ., ; Kluesner et al ., ]. Several geochemical signatures (e.g., low salinity, isotopic features and entrainment of thermogenic methane) indicate that discharged fluids originate from dehydration reactions at temperatures between 85° and 150°C [ Hensen et al ., ; Schmidt et al ., ].…”
Section: Geological Background and Iodp Site U1381amentioning
confidence: 99%