2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02561-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High diagnostic yield despite a lower completion rates for inpatient versus outpatient colon and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy: a nested case-control study

Abstract: Background Increased familiarity with capsule endoscopy (CE) has been associated with a growing demand for urgent inpatient procedures. Limited data exists comparing the effect of admission status on colon capsule (CCE) and pan-intestinal capsule (PIC) performance. We aimed to compare the quality of inpatient versus outpatient CCE and PIC studies. Methods A retrospective nested case-control study. Patients were identified from a CE database. PillCa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may ultimately be related to the study protocol itself, as PCE was interrupted at the end of the day per protocol in order to perform conventional colonoscopy rather than waiting until the capsule battery life was fully exhausted. Other possible contributing factors could be our patient's characteristics, such as advanced age [4,19,20,21]. Interestingly, inpatient status was not associated with a higher rate of incomplete examinations in our series.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This may ultimately be related to the study protocol itself, as PCE was interrupted at the end of the day per protocol in order to perform conventional colonoscopy rather than waiting until the capsule battery life was fully exhausted. Other possible contributing factors could be our patient's characteristics, such as advanced age [4,19,20,21]. Interestingly, inpatient status was not associated with a higher rate of incomplete examinations in our series.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 67%