2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-dimensional test for alpha in linear factor pricing models with sparse alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sparse alternatives, that is, the number of non‐zero alphas are very small, a max‐type test is preferred, such as Feng et al (2022). However, the max‐type test proposed in Feng et al (2022) performs not very well under the heavy‐tailed distributions. So how to construct a robust spatial‐sign‐based max‐type test for testing the high‐dimensional alpha deserves some further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the sparse alternatives, that is, the number of non‐zero alphas are very small, a max‐type test is preferred, such as Feng et al (2022). However, the max‐type test proposed in Feng et al (2022) performs not very well under the heavy‐tailed distributions. So how to construct a robust spatial‐sign‐based max‐type test for testing the high‐dimensional alpha deserves some further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above class of weighted spatial‐sign tests are sum‐type tests, which performs very well under the dense alternatives, that is, the number of non‐zero alphas are large. For the sparse alternatives, that is, the number of non‐zero alphas are very small, a max‐type test is preferred, such as Feng et al (2022). However, the max‐type test proposed in Feng et al (2022) performs not very well under the heavy‐tailed distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the GRS test is commonly used to address the above mentioned question, it has certain limitations. First, the GRS type test is only applicable when the number of assets N is fixed and much less than the number of observations T (e.g., Pesaran and Yamagata, 2017;Lan et al, 2018;Feng et al, 2022). This limitation arises from the inconsistency and nontrivial bias introduced by the sample covariance matrix estimator when N > T (Bai and Silverstein, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the HDA test is constrained by sparse alternatives, resolving only the first two limitations. To tackle the third limitation,Fan et al (2015) introduced a power enhancement screening procedure for increased test power against sparse alternatives, applicable to high-dimensional test assets Feng et al (2022). developed a max-of-squares-type test to assess the mean-variance efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma, Lan, Su, and Tsai (2020) employ polynomial spline techniques to allow for time variations in factor loadings when testing for alphas. Feng, Lan, Liu, and Ma (2022) propose a max-of-square type test of the intercepts instead of the average used in the literature, and recommend using a combination of the two testing procedures. He, He, Huang, and Zhou (2022) propose two statistics, a Wald type statistic which require n and T to be of the same order of magnitude and a standardised t-ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%