1997
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-dose carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan (CEM) with peripheral blood progenitor cell support as late intensification for high-risk cancer: non-haematological, haematological toxicities and role of growth factor administration

Abstract: Summary The present report describes the non-haematological toxicity and the influence of growth factor administration on haematological toxicity and haematopoietic recovery observed after high-dose carboplatin (1200 mg m-2), etoposide (900 mg m-2) and melphalan (100 mg m-2) (CEM) followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) in 40 patients with high-risk cancer during their first-line treatment. PBPCs were collected during the previous outpatient induction chemotherapy programme by leuk… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…transfusion requirements after autologous HSCT [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In contrast, clinical trials of rhEpo therapy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) resulted in accelerated erythroid engraftment and some reduction in transfusion requirements [17,18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transfusion requirements after autologous HSCT [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In contrast, clinical trials of rhEpo therapy after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) resulted in accelerated erythroid engraftment and some reduction in transfusion requirements [17,18,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the percentage of therapy-related deaths was in keeping with the results reported in the literature. 3,8,10 The clinical benefits produced by the use of hematopo-ietic growth factors after HDC and PBSC reinfusion are well established 13,28 even though the ideal combinations of growth factors have yet to be defined. We reported previously the advantage of adding rh-EPO to myelopoietic growth factors which translates into a potentiation of their effects in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously described, 12,13 eligibility criteria for HDC were the presence of histologically confirmed, advanced (FIGO stage IIIB-IV) epithelial ovarian cancer with a residual tumor р2 cm achieved at primary cytoreductive surgery or interval debulking surgery (IDS), no signs of progression after induction chemotherapy, age younger than 60 years, performance status of 0-1 (WHO scale), adequate bone marrow reserve (WBC count Ͼ4000 ϫ 10 6 /l, platelet count Ͼ100 ϫ 10 9 /l) and adequate pulmonary, cardiac, hepatic and renal function, as previously described. 12,13 The study was approved by the Hospital Human Investigation Review Board of the Catholic University and all patients gave informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations