2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rituximab Treatment for Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: A Cost Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only case series were previously reported, and a systematic review of acute AMR treatment published in October 2012 showed insufficient data to guide treatment. 12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]32 We showed that 1-year graft survival for AMR treated with IVIg, PE, and CS with or without rituximab was excellent, and we could not demonstrate a supplementary efficacy of rituximab by graft survival or our primary endpoint. An additional beneficial effect of PE and rituximab on graft survival was reported in a group of 12 patients receiving IVIg, PE, and rituximab (92%) as compared with a historical group of 12 patients receiving only IVIg (50%) 29 ; however, the respective impact of PE and rituximab could not be assessed, especially because graft survival was observed in about 80% of patients receiving IVIg and PE treatment in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only case series were previously reported, and a systematic review of acute AMR treatment published in October 2012 showed insufficient data to guide treatment. 12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]32 We showed that 1-year graft survival for AMR treated with IVIg, PE, and CS with or without rituximab was excellent, and we could not demonstrate a supplementary efficacy of rituximab by graft survival or our primary endpoint. An additional beneficial effect of PE and rituximab on graft survival was reported in a group of 12 patients receiving IVIg, PE, and rituximab (92%) as compared with a historical group of 12 patients receiving only IVIg (50%) 29 ; however, the respective impact of PE and rituximab could not be assessed, especially because graft survival was observed in about 80% of patients receiving IVIg and PE treatment in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 All other reports have been single case reports or case series. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] The findings suggest that rituximab may have some beneficial effects in the treatment of acute AMR along with standard treatment of the condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, a recent meta-analysis suggested that rituximab is a clinically effective treatment for AMR. (82) Treatment with rituximab is currently an expensive approach, and some recommend use only in AMR patients with low initial DSA titers (<1:128 dilution), creatinine of <3 mg/dL at the time of rejection, and mild tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis on renal biopsy (83). Reported adverse effects of rituximab therapy include lung toxicity, greater need for IVIg supplementation, infectious and infusion complications including fatal Jacob-Kreutzflet encephalitis (79, 84).…”
Section: Emerging Targets For Clinical Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three patients had significant viral infections but recovered fully. Several other recent reports support the utility of rituximab in treating acute AMR [50][51][52][53]. Some of the studies are limited by incomplete criteria for AMR diagnosis (especially older studies before the advent of DSA and C4d) and inconsistent patient variables.…”
Section: Rituximabmentioning
confidence: 99%