1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00298-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High dose rate intracoronary radiation for inhibition of neointimal formation in the stented and balloon-injured porcine models of restenosis: Angiographic, morphometric, and histopathologic analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated in animal models [3][4][5][6][7] and more recently in clinical studies that intracoronary irradiation significantly reduces restenosis, presumably by inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima formation. Irradiation of human femoral arteries appears to confirm these findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated in animal models [3][4][5][6][7] and more recently in clinical studies that intracoronary irradiation significantly reduces restenosis, presumably by inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and neointima formation. Irradiation of human femoral arteries appears to confirm these findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescribed dose positively correlated with inhibition of neointimal proliferation in animal studies 6,7 and in human pilot trials. 8,9 As a result, current dose-prescription protocols were organized in reference to these initial studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mazur, et al found that 10-25 Gy of 192 Ir using a high dose-rate afterloader inhibited the 4-week post-injury intimal thickening in left coronary arteries treated by balloon angioplasty but had no effect on the stented right coronary artery. 98) Wiedermann, et al also reported that neointima from aggressive oversize stenting did not respond to radiation therapy. The mixed results of these preliminary studies may be due either to the differences in doses or dose rates, variance in the healing response to stent injury, or some combination of these factors.…”
Section: Clinical Trials Using Gamma-irradiation (Table Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%