“…[1][2][3][4] With regard to efficiency,P SCs may be suitable for av ariety of applications because of their low cost, simple fabrication process, light weight, and high mechanical flexibility.U nfortunately,t he high efficiency of PSCs has mostly originated from highly rigid conductive glass substrates based on indium tin oxide (ITO) with poor mechanical flexibility.F or this reason, various alternative transparent conductive electrode (TCE) candidates have been researched, such as graphene, [5][6][7][8] carbon nanotubes, [9][10][11][12] metal nanowires, [13][14][15][16][17] poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate) (PE-DOT:PSS), [18][19][20][21][22][23] and metal mesh grids, [24][25][26][27] to replacet he conventional TCEs for flexible PSCs.A mong these TCE alternatives, the Ag mesh electrode is an attractive candidate because of its variousa dvantages,s uch as its good electrical, optical, and flexible characteristics, the possibility of mass production, and large area processibilityf or flexible optoelectronic devices. [28][29][30] Nonetheless, the direct applicationo ft he Ag mesh TCE for organic electronics still has drawbacks such as:1 )the possibility of shorting in the device because of the high pitch of the metal grid with as cale of several micrometers, 2) current inhomogeneity in the device based on the mesh structure, and 3) adhesionp roblems between the Ag mesh electrode and the flexible substrate. To solve the aforementioned problems, some researchers have suggestedt he use of metal mesh electrodesf abricated by nanoimprinting technologyb yu sing at hermalo re -beam evaporator.…”