SAE Technical Paper Series 2002
DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-2743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Efficiency and Low Emissions from a Port-Injected Engine with Neat Alcohol Fuels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the high octane index, high heat of vaporization and low combustion temperatures, the power and efficiency is significantly higher for methanol (and ethanol) compared to gasoline. This is certainly true for highly pressure-charged engines, where aggressive downsizing is possible on these alcohols [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high octane index, high heat of vaporization and low combustion temperatures, the power and efficiency is significantly higher for methanol (and ethanol) compared to gasoline. This is certainly true for highly pressure-charged engines, where aggressive downsizing is possible on these alcohols [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any alcohol blend with low gasoline content would operate in such an engine. Work at the EPA laboratories in Detroit (Brusstar et al, 2002) and at MIT (Bromberg & Cohn, 2008) has shown that both M85 and E85 in a low-displacement, spark-ignited, high-compression gasoline engine can obtain efficiencies exceeding that of diesel engines. So, in effect not only does this eliminate the near-factor-of-2 calorific (mileage) penalty of methanol, but you end up with a smaller engine that gets better mileage than a gasoline equivalent.…”
Section: How Gasoline Is Affectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any alcohol blend with low gasoline content would operate in such an engine. Work at the EPA laboratories in Detroit (Brusstar, Stuhldreher, Swain, & Pidgeon, 2002) and at MIT (Bromberg & Cohn, 2008) has shown that both M85 and E85 in a low-displacement, spark-ignited, high-compression gasoline engine can obtain efficiencies exceeding that of diesel engines. So, in effect not only does this eliminate the near-factor-of-2 calorific (mileage) penalty of methanol, but you end up with a smaller engine that gets better mileage than a gasoline equivalent.…”
Section: How Gasoline Is Affectedmentioning
confidence: 99%