2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High efficiency concentrated solar power plant receivers using periodic microstructured absorbing layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another route is to directly engineer the Si surface with AR structures, such as through colloidal lithography (Dev et al 2014), wet-etching processes (Adamian et al 2000), ion etching (Bien et al 2012), etc. Various micro-and submicro-structures have been used in PV cells (Zang et al 2013), or on the Si slabs too (Bichotte et al 2017;Jovanov et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another route is to directly engineer the Si surface with AR structures, such as through colloidal lithography (Dev et al 2014), wet-etching processes (Adamian et al 2000), ion etching (Bien et al 2012), etc. Various micro-and submicro-structures have been used in PV cells (Zang et al 2013), or on the Si slabs too (Bichotte et al 2017;Jovanov et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 = ( 1 + 2 + 3 ) ± 2√ = 1 2 + 2 3 + 3 1 (15) This relations conduct to (Vieta formulas) in [Eq. (16].…”
Section: Fractal Descartesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a geometrical optimization was possible to calculate an optimum ratio , width and length of the PCM. Results shows a numerically model validated with CFD study obtaining a good approximation of the real optimum The modeling approach for 1D microstructure absorbing multi-layers for Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) receivers is described in [16], the studied was use an optimized multilayer structure to achieve a higher absorption in receiver a Chandezon method was used as theoretically model to optimize grating profiles. In experimental results a total of 96.5% was obtained for absorption in the visible and UV range, which means an enhancement of 2% in comparison to non-structured coatings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-of-the-art surface texturing methods in CST coatings include the use of sacrificial beads with pre-selected sizes that burn during curing, thus introducing the desired microporosity in the coating, 15,26,27 and photolithography-based methods that can yield highly accurate surface morphologies. 12,28 However, methods based on sacrificial beads often lead to highly porous coatings that may weaken their mechanical strength. Photolithography-based methods can produce highly dense layers with micro-textured morphology, but the scalability is a major issue due to the vacuum requirements for deposition on tubes larger than 3 m. 28 Solar thermal receivers with tube lengths larger than 10 m are common in the industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%