2002
DOI: 10.1364/ol.27.001601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-efficiency coupling structure for a single-line-defect photonic-crystal waveguide

Abstract: We present the design and fabrication of a planar structure for coupling light from a multimode feed waveguide into a single-line-defect photonic-crystal waveguide. Finite-difference time-domain calculations predict a coupling efficiency of greater than 90%, and preliminary experimental results indicate successful coupling through a single-line-defect photonic-crystal waveguide. Device design, fabrication, and characterization are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the structure of PCW in Delphine et al ( 2008 ) , the transmission ef fi ciency of direct coupling is only 18 %. To avoid the in fl uence of coupling loss on the output of sensors, many coupling structures and techniques, such as interface resonant mode (Barclay et al 2004 ) , J-coupler structure (Prather et al 2002 ) , and adiabatic coupling (Mekis and Joannopoulos 2001 ;Sanchis et al 2002 ;Delphine et al 2008 ) , have been proposed and applied by many researchers. Interface resonant mode (Barclay et al 2004 ) can achieve a very high transmission in principle, but the useful bandwidth is limited by the resonance width.…”
Section: Problems With Coupling Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the structure of PCW in Delphine et al ( 2008 ) , the transmission ef fi ciency of direct coupling is only 18 %. To avoid the in fl uence of coupling loss on the output of sensors, many coupling structures and techniques, such as interface resonant mode (Barclay et al 2004 ) , J-coupler structure (Prather et al 2002 ) , and adiabatic coupling (Mekis and Joannopoulos 2001 ;Sanchis et al 2002 ;Delphine et al 2008 ) , have been proposed and applied by many researchers. Interface resonant mode (Barclay et al 2004 ) can achieve a very high transmission in principle, but the useful bandwidth is limited by the resonance width.…”
Section: Problems With Coupling Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interface resonant mode (Barclay et al 2004 ) can achieve a very high transmission in principle, but the useful bandwidth is limited by the resonance width. The J-coupler mode (Prather et al 2002 ) has a transmission of greater than 90 %, but it generally introduced radiation loss, which lowers the coupling ef fi ciency. Adiabatic coupling (Mekis and Joannopoulos 2001 ;Sanchis et al 2002 ;Delphine et al 2008 ) predicts near 100 % transmission over a large frequency range provided the change is slow; conversely, it requires very small changes over relatively large length scales, making manufacturing tolerances very strict.…”
Section: Problems With Coupling Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic algorithms have also been employed to design couplers using arbitrarily placed scattering cylinders (Jiang et al 2003, Hakansson, Sanchis, Sanchez-Dehesa andMarti 2005). (Non-taper-based couplers, from free space or parallel waveguides, have also been considered (Kuang et al 2002, Prather et al 2002, Barclay et al 2004, Hakansson, Sanchez-Dehesa and Sanchis 2005). Although this previous work did not explicitly account for uncertainties in the model parameters, the mostly small number of design parameters combined with the moderate group velocities help avoid non-manufacturable designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them proposed tapered waveguide structures 2-5 , or by using reflective structures to focus the light into the waveguide. 6 A different approach consists of using the anisotropy of the PC's equifrequency surfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%